Lilley Rebbecca, de Graaf Brandon, Kool Bridget, Davie Gabrielle, Reid Papaarangi, Dicker Bridget, Civil Ian, Ameratunga Shanthi, Branas Charles
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 26;9(7):e026026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026026.
Rapid access to advanced emergency medical and trauma care has been shown to significantly reduce mortality and disability. This study aims to systematically examine geographical access to prehospital care provided by emergency medical services (EMS) and advanced-level hospital care, for the smallest geographical units used in New Zealand and explores national disparities in geographical access to these services.
Observational study involving geospatial analysis estimating population access to EMS and advanced-level hospital care.
Population access to advanced-level hospital care via road and air EMS across New Zealand.
New Zealand population usually resident within geographical census meshblocks.
The proportion of the resident population with calculated EMS access to advanced-level hospital care within 60 min was examined by age, sex, ethnicity, level of deprivation and population density to identify disparities in geographical access.
An estimated 16% of the New Zealand population does not have timely EMS access to advanced-level hospital care via road or air. The 700 000 New Zealanders without timely access lived mostly in areas of low-moderate population density. Indigenous Māori, New Zealand European and older New Zealanders were less likely to have timely access.
These findings suggest that in New Zealand, geographically marginalised groups which tend to be rural and remote communities with disproportionately more indigenous Māori and older adults have poorer EMS access to advanced-level hospitals. Addressing these inequities in rapid access to medical care may lead to improvements in survival that have been documented for people who experience medical or surgical emergencies.
快速获得高级紧急医疗和创伤护理已被证明能显著降低死亡率和残疾率。本研究旨在系统地考察新西兰最小地理单元获得紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供的院前护理和高级医院护理的地理可达性,并探讨获得这些服务的地理可达性方面的全国差异。
一项涉及地理空间分析的观察性研究,估计人群获得EMS和高级医院护理的可达性。
新西兰各地人群通过公路和空中EMS获得高级医院护理的可达性。
通常居住在人口普查网格街区内的新西兰人口。
按年龄、性别、种族、贫困程度和人口密度,检查在60分钟内通过EMS获得高级医院护理的常住人口比例,以确定地理可达性方面的差异。
估计有16%的新西兰人口无法通过公路或空中及时获得EMS提供的高级医院护理。70万无法及时获得护理的新西兰人大多生活在人口密度低至中等的地区。毛利原住民、新西兰欧洲人和年长的新西兰人获得及时护理的可能性较小。
这些发现表明,在新西兰,地理上被边缘化的群体,往往是农村和偏远社区,其中毛利原住民和老年人比例过高,他们获得EMS提供的高级医院护理的机会较差。解决这些在快速获得医疗护理方面的不平等问题,可能会改善经历医疗或外科紧急情况的人的生存率,这一点已有记录。