Vernier-Mosca M, Feuvrier D, Obert L, Mauvais O, Loisel F, Pluvy I
Service de chirurgie orthopédique, traumatologique, plastique, reconstructrice et assistance main, CHRU Jean-Minjoz, 3, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France.
Service de chirurgie orthopédique, traumatologique, plastique, reconstructrice et assistance main, CHRU Jean-Minjoz, 3, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Laboratoire de nano-médecine, imagerie, thérapeutique, EA 4662, université de Franche-Comté, 16, route de Gray, 25030 Besançon, France.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2020 Jun;65(3):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the interest of the mechanical anastomosic coupling device for venous anastomoses in a series of cervico-facial reconstructions after carcinologic excision.
Between January 2010 and December 2017, 46 patients underwent free flap cervico-facial reconstruction. We performed 54 venous anastomoses for 51 free flaps. Mechanical venous anastomoses were performed with a coupler (Coupler®). Thrombotic complications and choice of recipient vessels were assessed for the entire series.
Venous anastomoses were performed using a coupler in 33.3% of the flaps (n=18). Mean operative time was lower for reconstructions with mechanical coupler anastomoses, and significantly for fibula flaps. Of eight thromboses, six were venous, two of which after the coupler anastomosis. The thrombosed veins were the branches of the internal jugular vein and the anterior jugular veins. The diameter of the couplers used was respectively 2.5mm and 2mm.
The use of the microvascular coupling system for venous anastomoeis would help reduce the occurrence of venous thrombosis, but larger and prospective studies should be conducted. This coupling system, relatively easy to use, would overcome the lack of congruence of anastomosing veins and reduce the risk of intimal injury. Regarding the recipient vessels, the anterior jugular vein should not be used as first line because the risk of vascular complications seems more important.
本研究旨在评估机械吻合耦合装置在一系列癌性切除术后颈面部重建中用于静脉吻合的效果。
2010年1月至2017年12月期间,46例患者接受了游离皮瓣颈面部重建手术。我们为51个游离皮瓣进行了54次静脉吻合。采用一种耦合器(Coupler®)进行机械静脉吻合。对整个系列病例评估血栓形成并发症及受区血管的选择情况。
33.3%的皮瓣(n = 18)采用耦合器进行静脉吻合。使用机械耦合器吻合进行重建时平均手术时间较短,腓骨皮瓣尤为明显。8例血栓形成病例中,6例为静脉血栓,其中2例发生在耦合器吻合术后。血栓形成的静脉为颈内静脉和颈前静脉的分支。所用耦合器的直径分别为2.5mm和2mm。
微血管耦合系统用于静脉吻合有助于减少静脉血栓形成的发生,但应开展更大规模和前瞻性的研究。这种耦合系统使用相对简便,可克服吻合静脉的不一致性并降低内膜损伤风险。关于受区血管,颈前静脉不应作为首选,因为其血管并发症风险似乎更高。