Cayuela Jean-Michel, Chomel Jean-Claude, Coiteux Valérie, Dulucq Stéphanie, Escoffre-Barbe Martine, Etancelin Pascaline, Etienne Gabriel, Hayette Sandrine, Millot Frédéric, Nibourel Olivier, Nicolini Franck-Emmanuel, Réa Delphine
Siège social, institut Bergonié, Groupe d'étude français pour la leucémie myéloïde chronique Fi-LMC, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Siège social, Groupe des biologistes moléculaires des hémopathies malignes (GBMHM), 7, avenue Marcel-Doret, 31500 Toulouse, France.
Siège social, institut Bergonié, Groupe d'étude français pour la leucémie myéloïde chronique Fi-LMC, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Siège social, Groupe des biologistes moléculaires des hémopathies malignes (GBMHM), 7, avenue Marcel-Doret, 31500 Toulouse, France.
Bull Cancer. 2020 Jan;107(1):113-128. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
In the context of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations still remain the sole biological marker that directly condition therapeutic decision. These recommendations aim at updating the use of BCR-ABL1 mutation testing with respect to new available therapeutic options and at repositioning different testing methods at the era of next generation sequencing (NGS). They have been written by a panel of experts from the French Study Group on CML (Fi-LMC), after a critical review of relevant publications. TKD mutation testing is recommended in case of treatment failure but not in case of optimal response. For patients in warning situation, mutation testing must be discussed depending on the type of TKI used, lasting of the treatment, kinetic evolution of BCR-ABL1 transcripts along time and necessity for switching treatment. The kind and the frequency of TKD mutations occasioning resistance mainly depend on the TKI in use and disease phase. Because of its better sensitivity, NGS methods are recommended for mutation testing rather than Sanger's. Facing a given TKD mutation, therapeutic decision should be taken based on in vitro sensitivity and clinical efficacy data. Identification by sequencing of a TKD mutation known to induce resistance must lead to a therapeutic change. The clinical value of testing methods more sensitive than NGS remains to be assessed.
在对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)耐药的慢性髓性白血病(CML)背景下,BCR-ABL1酪氨酸激酶结构域(TKD)突变仍然是直接决定治疗决策的唯一生物学标志物。这些建议旨在根据新的可用治疗选择更新BCR-ABL1突变检测的应用,并在新一代测序(NGS)时代重新定位不同的检测方法。它们由法国慢性髓性白血病研究组(Fi-LMC)的一组专家撰写,此前对相关出版物进行了严格审查。治疗失败时建议进行TKD突变检测,但最佳反应时不建议检测。对于处于警告状态的患者,必须根据所使用的TKI类型、治疗持续时间、BCR-ABL1转录本随时间的动力学演变以及更换治疗的必要性来讨论突变检测。导致耐药的TKD突变的种类和频率主要取决于所使用的TKI和疾病阶段。由于其更高的灵敏度,推荐使用NGS方法而非桑格测序法进行突变检测。面对特定的TKD突变,应根据体外敏感性和临床疗效数据做出治疗决策。通过测序鉴定出已知会诱导耐药的TKD突变必须导致治疗改变。比NGS更敏感的检测方法的临床价值仍有待评估。