Leukocyte Biology and Inflammation Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Structural Biology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA; Division of Nephrology/Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Departments of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Structure. 2019 Sep 3;27(9):1443-1451.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Targeting both integrins αVβ3 and α5β1 simultaneously appears to be more effective in cancer therapy than targeting each one alone. The structural requirements for bispecific binding of ligand to integrins have not been fully elucidated. RGD-containing knottin 2.5F binds selectively to αVβ3 and α5β1, whereas knottin 2.5D is αVβ3 specific. To elucidate the structural basis of this selectivity, we determined the structures of 2.5F and 2.5D as apo proteins and in complex with αVβ3, and compared their interactions with integrins using molecular dynamics simulations. These studies show that 2.5D engages αVβ3 by an induced fit, but conformational selection of a flexible RGD loop accounts for high-affinity selective binding of 2.5F to both integrins. The contrasting binding of the highly flexible low-affinity linear RGD peptides to multiple integrins suggests that a "Goldilocks zone" of conformational flexibility of the RGD loop in 2.5F underlies its selective binding promiscuity to integrins.
同时靶向整合素 αVβ3 和 α5β1 似乎比单独靶向每一种都更能有效治疗癌症。配体与整合素双特异性结合的结构要求尚未完全阐明。含有 RGD 的 knottin 2.5F 选择性地结合 αVβ3 和 α5β1,而 knottin 2.5D 是 αVβ3 特异性的。为了阐明这种选择性的结构基础,我们确定了 2.5F 和 2.5D 作为apo 蛋白的结构以及与 αVβ3 的复合物结构,并使用分子动力学模拟比较了它们与整合素的相互作用。这些研究表明,2.5D 通过诱导契合与 αVβ3 结合,但柔性 RGD 环的构象选择解释了 2.5F 与两种整合素的高亲和力选择性结合。高度灵活的低亲和力线性 RGD 肽与多种整合素的对比结合表明,2.5F 中 RGD 环的构象灵活性处于“金发姑娘区”,这是其对整合素选择性结合的基础。