Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Dec;34(12):3065-3073.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.062. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
The aim of this study is to estimate risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFF) and each anatomic subtype (calcar crack, trochanteric fracture, femoral shaft fracture) during primary total hip arthroplasty.
This retrospective cohort study included 793,823 primary total hip arthroplasties between 2004 and 2016. Multivariable regression modeling was used to estimate relative risk of patient, surgical, and implant factors for any IOPFF and for all anatomic subtypes of IOPFF. Clinically important interactions were assessed using multivariable regression.
Patient factors significantly increasing the risk of fracture were female gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 to 5, and preoperative diagnosis including avascular necrosis of the hip, previous trauma, inflammatory disease, pediatric disease, and previous infection. Overall risk of IOPFF associated with age was greatest in patients below 50 years and above 80 years. Risk of any fracture reduced with computer-guided surgery and in non-National Health Service hospitals. Nonposterior approaches increased the risk of shaft and trochanteric fracture only. Cementless implants significantly increased the risk of only calcar cracks and shaft fractures and not trochanteric fractures.
Fracture risk increases in patients younger than 50 and older than 80 years, females, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 to 5, and indications other than primary osteoarthritis. Large cumulative reduction in IOPFF risk may occur with use of cemented implants, posterior approach, and computer-guided surgery.
Level 3b (cohort study).
本研究旨在评估初次全髋关节置换术中发生假体周围股骨骨折(IOPFF)及各解剖亚型(股骨颈骨裂、转子间骨折、股骨干骨折)的危险因素。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2004 年至 2016 年间进行的 793823 例初次全髋关节置换术。采用多变量回归模型评估患者、手术和植入物因素与任何 IOPFF 及所有 IOPFF 解剖亚型的相对风险。采用多变量回归评估重要的临床交互作用。
女性、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 3 至 5 级和术前诊断为髋部缺血性坏死、既往创伤、炎症性疾病、儿科疾病和既往感染的患者发生骨折的风险显著增加。50 岁以下和 80 岁以上患者的 IOPFF 总体风险与年龄相关,风险最大。计算机辅助手术和非国立医疗服务(NHS)医院可降低与年龄相关的 IOPFF 风险。非后入路仅增加股骨干和转子间骨折的风险。非骨水泥植入物显著增加仅股骨颈骨裂和股骨干骨折的风险,而不增加转子间骨折的风险。
50 岁以下和 80 岁以上患者、女性、ASA 分级 3 至 5 级以及原发性骨关节炎以外的其他适应证的患者,骨折风险增加。使用骨水泥植入物、后入路和计算机辅助手术可能会显著降低 IOPFF 的风险。
3b 级(队列研究)。