Pacheco Nicole, Mollayeva Shirin, Jacob Binu, Colantonio Angela, Mollayeva Tatyana
Faculty of Honours Life Sciences, McMaster University, Toronto, Canada.
Acquired Brain Injury Research Lab, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Apr;43(7):903-919. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1644380. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
This research synthesized scientific evidence on the impact of interventions for adults with traumatic spinal cord injury on cognition, to understand if current intervention approaches are appropriate in light of the risk of post-injury cognitive impairments.
Medline, Central, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO and PubMed were searched for intervention in persons with SCI assessing cognition pre- and post-intervention. Study quality was completed using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools. Results were grouped by type of intervention. The meta-analysis involved calculation of pooled effect sizes for interventions utilizing the same cognitive measure.
Eleven studies of moderate quality discussed drug therapy, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, diet modification and dietary supplements, and inpatient rehabilitation. Some aspects of cognition were negatively affected by drugs while diet modification and supplement use, and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation showed no evidence of a difference in cognitive scores when compared with no intervention. Inpatient rehabilitation revealed a small but beneficial effect, when results of seven studies were pooled.
Evidence on the effects of interventions on cognitive functioning in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury is sparse and inconclusive, so work in this area is timely. It is valuable to know not only which interventions are effective for improving cognition, but also how other commonly used interventions, intended to treat other injury sequela, can affect cognition. PROSPERO: CRD42018087238.Implications for rehabilitationHistorically, rehabilitation of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury has targeted physical impairments, with little attention to cognition; this research aimed to understand if current interventions are appropriate in light of the risk of patients' cognitive impairments. Evidence on the effects of drug therapy, diet and dietary supplements interventions on cognitive functioning in traumatic spinal cord injury is sparse and inconclusive.Combining multiple inpatient rehabilitation interventions shows a positive but heterogeneous effect on the cognitive functioning; interventions applied earlier show greater gains.A major challenge for clinicians is to select an outcome measure sensitive to change over time, and to relate the results to patients' change in cognitive abilities with intervention applicationResearch to understand the functional effect of spinal cord injury on the widely distributed networks of the central and autonomic nervous systems subserving cognition, is timely.
本研究综合了关于创伤性脊髓损伤成人干预措施对认知影响的科学证据,以根据损伤后认知障碍风险判断当前干预方法是否合适。
检索了Medline、Central、Embase、Scopus、PsycINFO和PubMed,查找对脊髓损伤患者进行干预并在干预前后评估认知的研究。使用美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具完成研究质量评估。结果按干预类型分组。荟萃分析涉及对使用相同认知测量方法的干预措施计算合并效应量。
11项中等质量的研究讨论了药物治疗、经皮胫神经刺激、饮食调整和膳食补充剂以及住院康复。药物对认知的某些方面有负面影响,而饮食调整和补充剂的使用以及经皮胫神经刺激与无干预相比,在认知得分上没有差异。汇总7项研究结果时,住院康复显示出虽小但有益的效果。
关于干预措施对创伤性脊髓损伤患者认知功能影响的证据稀少且尚无定论,因此该领域的研究很及时。不仅要知道哪些干预措施对改善认知有效,还要了解其他旨在治疗其他损伤后遗症的常用干预措施如何影响认知,这很有价值。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO):CRD42018087238。对康复的启示从历史上看,创伤性脊髓损伤患者的康复主要针对身体损伤,很少关注认知;本研究旨在根据患者认知障碍风险判断当前干预措施是否合适。关于药物治疗、饮食和膳食补充剂干预对创伤性脊髓损伤认知功能影响的证据稀少且尚无定论。多种住院康复干预措施相结合对认知功能显示出积极但异质性的效果;早期应用的干预措施效果更佳。临床医生面临的一个主要挑战是选择对随时间变化敏感的结局指标,并将结果与干预应用后患者认知能力的变化联系起来了解脊髓损伤对服务于认知的中枢和自主神经系统广泛分布网络的功能影响的研究很及时。