Departamento de Tecnología Electrónica, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
IMS UMR 5218, CIH, ENSC, Bordeaux INP, Bordeaux, France.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2019 Jul 1;2019:7876248. doi: 10.1155/2019/7876248. eCollection 2019.
The vast majority of P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) systems are based on the well-known P300 speller presented by Farwell and Donchin for communication purposes and an alternative to people with neuromuscular disabilities, such as impaired eye movement. The purpose of the present work is to study the effect of speller size on P300-based BCI usability, measured in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction under overt and covert attention conditions. To this end, twelve participants used three speller sizes under both attentional conditions to spell 12 symbols. The results indicated that the speller size had, in both attentional conditions, a significant influence on performance. In both conditions (covert and overt), the best performances were obtained with the small and medium speller sizes, both being the most effective. The speller size did not significantly affect workload on the three speller sizes. In contrast, covert attention condition produced very high workload due to the increased resources expended to complete the task. Regarding users' preferences, significant differences were obtained between speller sizes. The small speller size was considered as the most complex, the most stressful, the less comfortable, and the most tiring. The medium speller size was always considered in the medium rank, which is the speller size that was evaluated less frequently and, for each dimension, the worst one. In this sense, the medium and the large speller sizes were considered as the most satisfactory. Finally, the medium speller size was the one to which the three standard dimensions were collected: high effectiveness, high efficiency, and high satisfaction. This work demonstrates that the speller size is an important parameter to consider in improving the usability of P300 BCI for communication purposes. The obtained results showed that using the proposed medium speller size, performance and satisfaction could be improved.
基于 P300 的脑机接口 (BCI) 系统绝大多数都是基于 Farwell 和 Donchin 提出的著名 P300 拼写器,旨在为运动神经障碍患者(如眼球运动障碍患者)提供一种交流替代方式。本研究旨在探讨拼写器大小对基于 P300 的 BCI 可用性的影响,具体从外显和内隐注意条件下的有效性、效率和满意度三个方面进行衡量。为此,十二名参与者在两种注意条件下使用三种拼写器大小拼写 12 个符号。结果表明,在两种注意条件下,拼写器大小对表现都有显著影响。在两种条件下(内隐和外显),小尺寸和中尺寸拼写器的性能最佳,二者均具有最高的效率。拼写器大小对三种拼写器的工作负荷没有显著影响。相比之下,内隐注意条件由于完成任务所需的资源增加,产生了非常高的工作负荷。关于用户偏好,在拼写器大小之间获得了显著差异。小尺寸拼写器被认为是最复杂、最紧张、最不舒服和最累人的。中尺寸拼写器总是被认为处于中等水平,即被评价频率较低,且在每个维度上的评价都最差。从中可以看出,中尺寸和大尺寸拼写器被认为是最令人满意的。最后,中尺寸拼写器具有三个标准维度:高有效性、高效率和高满意度。本研究表明,拼写器大小是提高 P300 BCI 通信可用性的一个重要考虑因素。所得结果表明,使用建议的中尺寸拼写器可以提高性能和满意度。