Suppr超能文献

针刺作为慢性稳定型心绞痛辅助治疗的随机临床试验

Acupuncture as Adjunctive Therapy for Chronic Stable Angina: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Zhao Ling, Li Dehua, Zheng Hui, Chang Xiaorong, Cui Jin, Wang Ruihui, Shi Jing, Fan Hailong, Li Ying, Sun Xin, Zhang Fuwen, Wu Xi, Liang Fanrong

机构信息

Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Department of Acupuncture, the Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1388-1397. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2407.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The effects of acupuncture as adjunctive treatment to antianginal therapies for patients with chronic stable angina are uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture as adjunctive therapy to antianginal therapies in reducing frequency of angina attacks in patients with chronic stable angina.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this 20-week randomized clinical trial conducted in outpatient and inpatient settings at 5 clinical centers in China from October 10, 2012, to September 19, 2015, 404 participants were randomly assigned to receive acupuncture on the acupoints on the disease-affected meridian (DAM), receive acupuncture on the acupoints on the nonaffected meridian (NAM), receive sham acupuncture (SA), and receive no acupuncture (wait list [WL] group). Participants were 35 to 80 years of age with chronic stable angina based on the criteria of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association, with angina occurring at least twice weekly. Statistical analysis was conducted from December 1, 2015, to July 30, 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants in the 4 groups received antianginal therapies as recommended by the guidelines. Participants in the DAM, NAM, and SA groups received acupuncture treatment 3 times weekly for 4 weeks for a total of 12 sessions. Participants in the WL group did not receive acupuncture during the 16-week study period.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Participants used diaries to record angina attacks. The primary outcome was the change in frequency of angina attacks every 4 weeks from baseline to week 16.

RESULTS

A total of 398 participants (253 women and 145 men; mean [SD] age, 62.6 [9.7] years) were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the 4 groups. Mean changes in frequency of angina attacks differed significantly among the 4 groups at 16 weeks: a greater reduction of angina attacks was observed in the DAM group vs the NAM group (difference, 4.07; 95% CI, 2.43-5.71; P < .001), in the DAM group vs the SA group (difference, 5.18; 95% CI, 3.54-6.81; P < .001), and in the DAM group vs the WL group (difference, 5.63 attacks; 95% CI, 3.99-7.27; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with acupuncture on the NAM, SA, or no acupuncture (WL), acupuncture on the DAM as adjunctive treatment to antianginal therapy showed superior benefits in alleviating angina.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01686230.

摘要

重要性

针刺作为慢性稳定型心绞痛患者抗心绞痛治疗辅助手段的效果尚不确定。

目的

探讨针刺作为抗心绞痛治疗辅助疗法在降低慢性稳定型心绞痛患者心绞痛发作频率方面的疗效和安全性。

设计、地点和参与者:本为期20周的随机临床试验于2012年10月10日至2015年9月19日在中国5个临床中心的门诊和住院部进行,404名参与者被随机分配接受病侧经络穴位针刺(DAM组)、非病侧经络穴位针刺(NAM组)、假针刺(SA组)以及不接受针刺(等待列表[WL]组)。参与者年龄在35至80岁之间,符合美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会标准的慢性稳定型心绞痛患者,心绞痛每周至少发作两次。统计分析于2015年12月1日至2016年7月30日进行。

干预措施

4组所有参与者均按照指南推荐接受抗心绞痛治疗。DAM组、NAM组和SA组参与者每周接受3次针刺治疗,共4周,总计12次。WL组参与者在16周的研究期间不接受针刺治疗。

主要结局和测量指标

参与者使用日记记录心绞痛发作情况。主要结局是从基线到第16周每4周心绞痛发作频率的变化。

结果

意向性分析纳入了总共398名参与者(253名女性和145名男性;平均[标准差]年龄,62.6[9.7]岁)。4组基线特征具有可比性。在第16周时,4组心绞痛发作频率的平均变化存在显著差异:与NAM组相比,DAM组心绞痛发作减少更明显(差异为4.07;95%置信区间,2.43 - 5.71;P < .001),与SA组相比(差异为5.18;95%置信区间,3.54 - 6.81;P < .001),与WL组相比(差异为5.63次发作;95%置信区间,3.99 - 7.27;P < .001)。

结论和相关性

与NAM组针刺、SA组针刺或不针刺(WL组)相比,病侧经络穴位针刺作为抗心绞痛治疗的辅助手段在缓解心绞痛方面显示出更优的效果。

试验注册

ClinicalTriTriTri.gov标识符:NCT01686230。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验