Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Sep;55(9):1009-1012. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14577. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
In complex decisions, there are times when there may be a conflict between the recommendations from clinical practice guidelines and the outcome of a shared decision-making process between the clinician and the patient. Sticking rigidly to practice guidelines can be seen as paternalistic and even dismissive of a patient's specific circumstances and preferences; however, failing to adhere to such guidelines can be troubling for many doctors. In this article, we present and discuss this conflict using the common problem of how to provide family-centred, yet evidence-based guidance on infant sleep practices. Infant sleep practices are a common discussion topic at well-baby visits, and family preferences for infant sleep practices are often at odds with national recommendations. With three cases as a backdrop, we discuss how cultural humility, complexity and trust can be key factors in how the clinician-parent discussion on infant sleep can incorporate safe sleep guidelines into a family-centred, culturally relevant discussion.
在复杂的决策中,有时临床实践指南的建议与临床医生和患者之间的共同决策过程的结果之间可能存在冲突。严格坚持实践指南可能被视为家长式作风,甚至无视患者的具体情况和偏好;然而,不遵守这些指南可能会让许多医生感到困扰。在本文中,我们使用如何为婴儿睡眠实践提供以家庭为中心且基于证据的指导这一常见问题来展示和讨论这一冲突。婴儿睡眠实践是婴儿健康访视中的一个常见讨论话题,家庭对婴儿睡眠实践的偏好往往与国家建议不一致。通过三个案例为背景,我们讨论了文化谦逊、复杂性和信任如何成为临床医生与家长讨论婴儿睡眠时如何将安全睡眠指南纳入以家庭为中心、具有文化相关性讨论的关键因素。