Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.149. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Despite the recent increase of transradial access among neurointerventionalists, there is still a paucity of evidence in the neurosurgical literature. There are 3 newly Food and Drug Administration-approved devices-Woven EndoBridge (WEB), Surpass, and PulseRider-that significantly expand the options available for endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Our work reports the safety and feasibility of radial artery catheterization for the deployment of these new devices.
We performed a review of the first 10 patients with an unruptured cerebral aneurysm treated via a transradial cerebral angiogram. Seven patients underwent embolization with the WEB device, 1 patient underwent embolization with the PulseRider, and 2 patients underwent embolization with the Surpass device. We describe in detail our workflow and the devices used for transradial access.
The aneurysms treated include internal carotid artery bifurcation, middle cerebral artery, anterior communicating artery, basilar tip, and posterior communicating artery. All patients underwent radial artery catheterization, and none of them had to be converted to femoral artery access. Of the 10 patients, 9 required a single attempt for accurate device deployment. One patient had unsuccessful placement of the WEB device and required coiling of the aneurysm because of device herniation into the parent vessel. None of the patients had any postoperative complications and were discharged the following day with the same modified Rankin scale score as preoperatively.
Our experience with 10 patients revealed no limitations during catheterization and deployment of these devices. One patient had to be converted to coil embolization, which was feasible through the same vascular access. None of the patients had vascular complications postoperatively with minimal wrist discomfort.
尽管神经介入医师最近越来越多地采用经桡动脉入路,但神经外科学文献中仍缺乏相关证据。有 3 种新的经食品和药物管理局批准的装置——编织式 EndoBridge(WEB)、Surpass 和 PulseRider——为颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗提供了更多选择。我们的工作报告了经桡动脉入路放置这些新装置的安全性和可行性。
我们回顾了前 10 例接受经桡动脉脑血管造影治疗的未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者。7 例患者采用 WEB 装置进行栓塞治疗,1 例患者采用 PulseRider 进行栓塞治疗,2 例患者采用 Surpass 装置进行栓塞治疗。我们详细描述了我们的工作流程和用于经桡动脉入路的装置。
治疗的动脉瘤包括颈内动脉分叉部、大脑中动脉、前交通动脉、基底动脉尖和后交通动脉。所有患者均接受了桡动脉导管插入术,且均无需转为股动脉入路。10 例患者中,有 9 例患者仅需一次尝试即可准确放置装置。1 例患者 WEB 装置放置不成功,由于装置疝入载瘤动脉,需要对动脉瘤进行线圈栓塞。所有患者均无术后并发症,且次日出院时改良 Rankin 量表评分与术前相同。
我们对 10 例患者的经验表明,在这些装置的导管插入和放置过程中没有任何限制。1 例患者需要转为线圈栓塞治疗,但通过相同的血管入路是可行的。所有患者术后均无血管并发症,手腕不适感轻微。