Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated with Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, People's Republic of China.
Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated with Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, People's Republic of China.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e346-e352. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.153. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
The present study compared the clinical functional outcomes and new vertebral compression fractures (NVCFs) between percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and conservative treatment (CT) in patients with severe pain due to acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). PVP has been increasingly used for the treatment of pain in patients with OVCFs. However, the effectiveness of the procedure and whether it causes NVCFs has remained controversial.
A total of 544 eligible patients with OVCFs found on spinal radiographs and intractable back pain for ≤6 weeks were recruited from September 2012 to February 2018 and assigned to PVP (n = 280; 392 levels) or CT (n = 264; 366 levels). The visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were determined before the intervention and at the 1-week and 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up examinations. In addition, monthly telephone follow-up interviews were performed. In the case of a sudden increase in back pain, the patient returned to the hospital for medical and magnetic resonance imaging examinations for NVCF detection.
The PVP group had significantly lower visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores than those for the CT group at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months (P < 0.05). However, the differences after 6 months were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Similar numbers of NVCFs (total and adjacent fractures) were found at 24 months in both groups (P > 0.05).
Compared with CT, PVP provided a rapid decrease in pain and an early return to daily life activities, without an increase in the incidence of NVCFs.
本研究比较了经皮椎体成形术(PVP)与保守治疗(CT)治疗因急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)引起严重疼痛患者的临床功能结果和新发椎体压缩性骨折(NVCFs)。PVP 已越来越多地用于治疗 OVCFs 患者的疼痛。然而,该手术的有效性及其是否导致 NVCFs 仍存在争议。
2012 年 9 月至 2018 年 2 月,共招募了 544 例在脊柱 X 线片上发现 OVCFs 且背痛持续≤6 周的患者,并将其分为 PVP(n=280;392 个节段)或 CT(n=264;366 个节段)组。在干预前及 1 周、1、3、6、12 和 24 个月随访时,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分进行评估。此外,每月进行电话随访。若背痛突然加重,患者返回医院进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查以检测 NVCF。
PVP 组患者的 VAS 和 ODI 评分在 1 周和 1、3、6 个月时均显著低于 CT 组(P<0.05),但在 6 个月后差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者在 24 个月时新发的 NVCFs(总骨折和相邻骨折)数量相似(P>0.05)。
与 CT 相比,PVP 可迅速缓解疼痛并使患者早日恢复日常生活活动,且不会增加 NVCFs 的发生率。