Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Addict Behav. 2019 Nov;98:106053. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106053. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Limited research among adolescents and young adults (AYA) has assessed tobacco and marijuana co-use in light of specific products. We examined the patterns of past 30-day co-use of tobacco and marijuana products, and the product-specific associations among past 30-day use of these substances.
Data from three school-based convenience samples of California AYA (aged 15-22) (Sample 1 = 3008; Sample 2 = 1419; Sample 3 = 466) were collected during 2016-2017. Proportions of past 30-day co-use of tobacco (e-cigarettes, cigarettes, hookah, cigars) and marijuana (combustible, vaporized, edible, blunt) were estimated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between use of each tobacco and marijuana product for individual samples, then the pooled analysis calculated combined ORs.
In the three samples, 7.3-11.3% of participants reported past 30-day co-use. Combinations of e-cigarettes or cigarettes and combustible marijuana were the most common co-use patterns. Past 30-day use of e-cigarettes or cigarettes (vs. non-use) increased the odds of past 30-day use of all marijuana products [e-cigarettes: ORs (95%CI) ranging from 2.5 (1.7, 3.2) for edible marijuana to 4.0 (2.8, 5.2) for combustible marijuana; cigarettes: from 3.2 (2.1, 4.2) for vaporized marijuana to 5.5 (3.8, 7.3) for combustible marijuana]. Past 30-day use of hookah or cigars was positively associated with past 30-day use of three of four marijuana products, except for hookah and vaporized marijuana, and for cigars and combustible marijuana.
Given various co-use patterns and significant associations among tobacco and marijuana products, interventions targeting AYA should address co-use across the full spectrum of specific products for both substances.
针对特定产品,青少年和年轻人(AYA)中的有限研究评估了烟草和大麻的共同使用情况。我们研究了过去 30 天内同时使用烟草和大麻产品的模式,以及这些物质过去 30 天内使用的特定产品之间的关联。
在 2016 年至 2017 年期间,从加利福尼亚州的三个基于学校的 AYA 便利样本中收集了数据(样本 1=3008;样本 2=1419;样本 3=466)。估计了过去 30 天内同时使用烟草(电子烟、香烟、水烟、雪茄)和大麻(可燃烧的、汽化的、可食用的、压扁的)的比例。多变量逻辑回归分析检查了每个烟草和大麻产品在个体样本中的使用之间的关联,然后汇总分析计算了合并的 OR 值。
在三个样本中,7.3%至 11.3%的参与者报告过去 30 天内同时使用。电子烟或香烟和可燃烧大麻的组合是最常见的同时使用模式。过去 30 天内使用电子烟或香烟(与不使用相比)增加了过去 30 天内使用所有大麻产品的几率[电子烟:可食用大麻的比值比(95%CI)范围从 2.5(1.7, 3.2)到可燃烧大麻的 4.0(2.8, 5.2);香烟:从汽化大麻的 3.2(2.1, 4.2)到可燃烧大麻的 5.5(3.8, 7.3)]。过去 30 天内使用水烟或雪茄与四种大麻产品中的三种过去 30 天内的使用情况呈正相关,除了水烟和汽化大麻,以及雪茄和可燃烧大麻。
鉴于各种同时使用模式以及烟草和大麻产品之间的显著关联,针对 AYA 的干预措施应该针对两种物质的特定产品的全部范围解决共同使用问题。