University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Pharmacy, Centre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Sep 23;63(10). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01265-19. Print 2019 Oct.
Evaluation of dosing regimens for critically ill patients requires pharmacokinetic data in this population. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam in critically ill patients without renal impairment and to assess the adequacy of recommended dosing regimens for treatment of systemic infections. Patients received 1.5 or 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam according to clinician recommendation. Unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma concentrations were assayed, and data were analyzed with Pmetrics with subsequent Monte Carlo simulations. A two-compartment model adequately described the data from twelve patients. Urinary creatinine clearance (CL) and body weight described between-patient variability in clearance and central volume of distribution (), respectively. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) parameter estimates for unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively, were CL of 7.2 ± 3.2 and 25.4 ± 9.4 liters/h, of 20.4 ± 3.7 and 32.4 ± 10 liters, rate constant for distribution of unbound ceftolozane or tazobactam from central to peripheral compartment (Kcp) of 0.46 ± 0.74 and 2.96 ± 8.6 h, and rate constant for distribution of unbound ceftolozane or tazobactam from peripheral to central compartment (Kpc) of 0.39 ± 0.37 and 26.5 ± 8.4 h With dosing at 1.5 g and 3.0 g every 8 h (q8h), the fractional target attainment (FTA) against was ≥85% for directed therapy (MIC ≤ 4 mg/liter). However, for empirical coverage (MIC up to 64 mg/liter), the FTA was 84% with the 1.5-g q8h regimen when creatinine clearance is 180 ml/min/1.73 m, whereas the 3.0-g q8h regimen consistently achieved an FTA of ≥85%. For a target of 40% of time the free drug concentration is above the MIC (40% T), 3g q8h by intermittent infusion is suggested unless a highly susceptible pathogen is present, in which case 1.5-g dosing could be used. If a higher target of 100% T is required, a 1.5-g loading dose plus a 4.5-g continuous infusion may be adequate.
评价危重症患者的给药方案需要该人群的药代动力学数据。这项前瞻性观察研究旨在描述无肾损伤的危重症患者中游离头孢他啶和他唑巴坦的群体药代动力学,并评估推荐的治疗全身感染的给药方案是否足够。根据临床医生的建议,患者接受 1.5 或 3.0 g 头孢他啶-他唑巴坦。测定游离头孢他啶和他唑巴坦的血浆浓度,并使用 Pmetrics 进行分析,随后进行蒙特卡罗模拟。一个两室模型充分描述了 12 名患者的数据。尿肌酐清除率 (CL) 和体重分别描述了清除率和中央分布容积 ()的个体间变异性。游离头孢他啶和他唑巴坦的平均±标准偏差 (SD) 参数估计值分别为 CL 为 7.2±3.2 和 25.4±9.4 升/小时, 为 20.4±3.7 和 32.4±10 升,游离头孢他啶或他唑巴坦从中央室到外周室的分布速率常数 (Kcp) 为 0.46±0.74 和 2.96±8.6 h,游离头孢他啶或他唑巴坦从外周室到中央室的分布速率常数 (Kpc) 为 0.39±0.37 和 26.5±8.4 h。对于每 8 小时给予 1.5 g 和 3.0 g 的剂量(q8h),对于定向治疗(MIC≤4 mg/l),目标浓度的分数达标率(FTA)≥85%。然而,对于经验性覆盖(MIC 高达 64 mg/l),当肌酐清除率为 180 ml/min/1.73 m 时,1.5 g q8h 方案的 FTA 为 84%,而 3.0 g q8h 方案始终能达到≥85%的 FTA。如果目标是 40%的时间游离药物浓度高于 MIC(40%T),建议使用间歇性输注的 3 g q8h,除非存在高度敏感的病原体,在这种情况下可以使用 1.5 g 剂量。如果需要更高的 100%T 目标,则 1.5 g 负荷剂量加 4.5 g 持续输注可能足够。