• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳乳房切除术和即刻基于植入物的重建术后乳房皮瓣坏死:肿胀和锐性解剖技术对手术结果的评估。

Mastectomy flap necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction: An evaluation of tumescence and sharp dissection technique on surgical outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, St Joseph's Hospital, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Division of General Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, St Joseph's Hospital, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Breast J. 2019 Nov;25(6):1079-1083. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13442. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1111/tbj.13442
PMID:31359567
Abstract

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate implant-based reconstruction has better esthetic outcomes and improved patient satisfaction, in addition to being oncologically safe. A known complication of NSM is skin flap necrosis. The use of tumescence and sharp dissection may decrease this complication compared to the standard NSM technique using electrocautery. This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent a NSM between 2014 and 2017 at a regional cancer center. Tumescence with sharp dissection was compared to electrocautery. The primary outcome was skin flap necrosis. The secondary outcomes were operative time and management of the complication. A total of 62 patients underwent a NSM with 116 breasts being operated on. Full-thickness necrosis occurred more frequently in the standard electrocautery group (12.8%) compared to the tumescence and sharp dissection group (1.3%; P = 0.02). Partial-thickness necrosis also occurred more frequently in the standard group (33.3%) compared to the sharp dissection group (13.0%; P = 0.01). The operative time was significantly shorter in the sharp dissection group with the mean (SD) time being 183.5 (48.9) minutes compared to the standard electrocautery group at 202.9 (33.8) minutes (P = 0.03). NSM using tumescence and sharp dissection have a lower rate of the complications of partial- and full-thickness necrosis. Shorter operative time was also seen with the tumescent technique.

摘要

保留乳头的乳房切除术(NSM)联合即刻假体植入重建具有更好的美观效果和患者满意度,同时也具有肿瘤学安全性。NSM 的已知并发症是皮瓣坏死。与使用电烙术的标准 NSM 技术相比,使用肿胀和锐性解剖可以降低这种并发症的发生。这是对 2014 年至 2017 年在一个地区癌症中心接受 NSM 的患者进行的回顾性研究。肿胀锐性解剖与电烙术进行了比较。主要结果是皮瓣坏死。次要结果是手术时间和并发症的处理。共有 62 例患者接受了 NSM,116 个乳房接受了手术。全层坏死在标准电烙术组(12.8%)比肿胀锐性解剖组(1.3%)更常见(P=0.02)。标准组的部分厚度坏死也更常见(33.3%),而锐性解剖组为 13.0%(P=0.01)。锐性解剖组的手术时间明显缩短,平均(SD)时间为 183.5(48.9)分钟,而标准电烙术组为 202.9(33.8)分钟(P=0.03)。使用肿胀和锐性解剖的 NSM 发生部分和全层坏死并发症的几率较低。肿胀技术也可以缩短手术时间。

相似文献

1
Mastectomy flap necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction: An evaluation of tumescence and sharp dissection technique on surgical outcomes.保乳乳房切除术和即刻基于植入物的重建术后乳房皮瓣坏死:肿胀和锐性解剖技术对手术结果的评估。
Breast J. 2019 Nov;25(6):1079-1083. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13442. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
2
The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.经乳晕下皱襞侧方切口行保留乳头的乳房切除术:50 余例即刻乳房假体植入再造术的结果。
Breast J. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):31-40. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12043. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
3
Oncological and Surgical Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Do Incisions Matter?保留乳头乳房切除术后的肿瘤学和手术结果:切口重要吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3226-31. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5323-z. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
Outcomes after tumescence technique versus electrocautery mastectomy.肿胀技术与电灼切除术治疗乳房的效果比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Aug;19(8):2607-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2304-8. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
5
Risk Factors for Skin Flap and Nipple-Areolar Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction.保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术联合腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房再造术后皮瓣及乳头乳晕坏死的危险因素。
Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):2769-2779. doi: 10.1177/00031348241250039. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
6
Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.高乳腺癌风险人群双侧预防性乳房切除术后即刻植入式乳房重建的患者满意度及乳头乳晕敏感性:保留乳头乳房切除术与保留皮肤乳房切除术的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;77(2):145-52. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000366.
7
Risk Factors for Skin Flap Necrosis in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Breast Reconstruction.接受乳房切除术后即刻乳房重建的乳腺癌患者皮瓣坏死的危险因素
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):846-852. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4852-y.
8
Effects of Prostaglandin E1 on Mastectomy Flap Necrosis in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.前列腺素 E1 对即刻乳房重建中乳房皮瓣坏死的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Aug 1;154(2):278-286. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010991. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
9
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Threatened Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Flaps: An Adjunct for Flap Salvage.高压氧治疗保乳手术中受威胁的皮瓣:皮瓣挽救的辅助手段。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 May 1;90(5S Suppl 2):S125-S129. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003441. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
10
Does the reconstruction method influence development of mastectomy flap complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy?重建方式是否会影响保留乳头的乳房切除术乳房皮瓣并发症的发展?
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Nov;66(11):1543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.032. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Tumescence and Sharp Dissection Versus Electrocautery Dissection in Minimal-Access Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthesis Breast Reconstruction: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.肿胀麻醉与锐性解剖对比电灼解剖在即刻假体乳房重建的微创保乳全切除术中的手术及肿瘤学结果:一项真实世界回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17680-4.
2
Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) Clinical Practice Guideline.非转移性乳腺癌患者的乳房切除术后乳房重建:安大略省卫生厅(安大略省癌症护理)临床实践指南。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 17;32(6):357. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060357.
3
Switching to Tumescent Dissection in Mastectomy.
在乳房切除术中改用肿胀麻醉下解剖法。
Breast J. 2025 Jan 27;2025:7634729. doi: 10.1155/tbj/7634729. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluation of safety and operative time in tumescent-free robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective single-center cohort study.无肿胀机器人保乳根治术的安全性及手术时间评估:一项回顾性单中心队列研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Jul;107(1):8-15. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.1.8. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
5
Complication Differences Between the Tumescent and Non-Tumescent Dissection Techniques for Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis.乳房切除术肿胀麻醉与非肿胀麻醉解剖技术的并发症差异:一项荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;11:648955. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.648955. eCollection 2021.
6
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: Impact on Surgical Resection, Oncologic Safety, and Psychological Well-Being.乳腺癌保乳根治术:对手术切除、肿瘤学安全性及心理健康的影响
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2021 Jul;12(5):499-506. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2021.12.5.5. Epub 2021 Jul 1.