Heberling Matthew T, Thurston Hale W, Nietch Christopher T
Research Economist, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., MS 483, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
Assistant Lab Director, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., MS 483, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2018;54(3):586-593. doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.12648.
Water quality trading (WQT) has potential to be a low-cost means for achieving water quality goals. WQT allows regulated wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) facing discharge limits the flexibility to either reduce their own discharge or purchase pollution control from other WWTPs or nonpoint sources (NPSs) such as agricultural producers. Under this limited scope, programs with NPSs have been largely unsuccessful at meeting water quality goals. The decision to participate in trading depends on many factors including the pollution control costs, uncertainty in pollution control, and discharge limits. Current research that focuses on making WQT work tends to identify how to increase participation by traditional traders such as WWTPs and agricultural producers. As an alternative, but complementary approach, we consider whether augmenting WQT markets with non-traditional participants would help increase the number of trades. Determining the economic incentives for these potential participants requires the development of novel benefit functions requiring not only economic considerations, but also accounting for ecological and engineering processes. Existing literature on non-traditional participants in environmental markets tends to center on air quality and only increasing citizen participation as buyers. Here, we consider the issues for broadening participation (both buyers and sellers) in WQT and outline a multidisciplinary approach to begin evaluating feasibility.
水质交易(WQT)有潜力成为实现水质目标的低成本手段。水质交易允许面临排放限制的受监管污水处理厂(WWTPs)灵活选择要么减少自身排放,要么从其他污水处理厂或非点源(NPSs)(如农业生产者)购买污染控制。在这种有限范围内,涉及非点源的项目在实现水质目标方面大多未成功。参与交易的决定取决于许多因素,包括污染控制成本、污染控制的不确定性和排放限制。当前专注于使水质交易发挥作用的研究往往着眼于如何提高传统交易方(如污水处理厂和农业生产者)的参与度。作为一种替代但互补的方法,我们考虑用非传统参与者扩充水质交易市场是否有助于增加交易量。确定这些潜在参与者的经济激励措施需要开发新颖的效益函数,这不仅需要考虑经济因素,还需兼顾生态和工程过程。关于环境市场中非传统参与者的现有文献往往以空气质量为中心,且仅关注增加公民作为买家的参与度。在此,我们探讨在水质交易中扩大参与度(包括买家和卖家)的相关问题,并概述一种多学科方法以开始评估可行性。