Suppr超能文献

将水质与福祉联系起来,以改进生态系统服务的评估和估值。

Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services.

机构信息

Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 6;109(45):18619-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215991109. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

Abstract

Despite broad recognition of the value of the goods and services provided by nature, existing tools for assessing and valuing ecosystem services often fall short of the needs and expectations of decision makers. Here we address one of the most important missing components in the current ecosystem services toolbox: a comprehensive and generalizable framework for describing and valuing water quality-related services. Water quality is often misrepresented as a final ecosystem service. We argue that it is actually an important contributor to many different services, from recreation to human health. We present a valuation approach for water quality-related services that is sensitive to different actions that affect water quality, identifies aquatic endpoints where the consequences of changing water quality on human well-being are realized, and recognizes the unique groups of beneficiaries affected by those changes. We describe the multiple biophysical and economic pathways that link actions to changes in water quality-related ecosystem goods and services and provide guidance to researchers interested in valuing these changes. Finally, we present a valuation template that integrates biophysical and economic models, links actions to changes in service provision and value estimates, and considers multiple sources of water quality-related ecosystem service values without double counting.

摘要

尽管人们广泛认识到自然提供的商品和服务的价值,但现有的生态系统服务评估和估值工具往往不能满足决策者的需求和期望。在这里,我们解决了当前生态系统服务工具箱中最重要的缺失部分之一:一个全面和可推广的描述和评估与水质相关服务的框架。水质经常被错误地表示为最终的生态系统服务。我们认为,它实际上是许多不同服务的重要贡献者,从娱乐到人类健康。我们提出了一种对与水质相关服务的估值方法,该方法对影响水质的不同行动敏感,确定了水质变化对人类福祉的后果实现的水生终点,并认识到受到这些变化影响的独特受益群体。我们描述了将行动与水质相关生态系统商品和服务变化联系起来的多种生物物理和经济途径,并为有兴趣评估这些变化的研究人员提供了指导。最后,我们提出了一个估值模板,该模板整合了生物物理和经济模型,将行动与服务提供和价值估计的变化联系起来,并考虑了多个水质相关生态系统服务价值的来源,而不会重复计算。

相似文献

4
Valuing ecosystem services in terms of ecological risks and returns.从生态风险和回报的角度评估生态系统服务。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Apr;25(2):250-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01623.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
9
Refocusing on nature: holistic assessment of ecosystem services.重新关注自然:生态系统服务的整体评估。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2012 Jul;8(3):401-11. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1279. Epub 2012 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

8
Perspectives on valuing water quality improvements using stated preference methods.使用意愿调查法评估水质改善的价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 2;120(18):e2217456120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2217456120. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

4
Lag time in water quality response to best management practices: a review.最佳管理措施对水质响应的时滞:综述。
J Environ Qual. 2009 Dec 30;39(1):85-96. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0108. Print 2010 Jan-Feb.
8
Linking hypoxia to shrimp catch in the northern Gulf of Mexico.将缺氧与墨西哥湾北部的虾类捕捞联系起来。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2007 Apr;54(4):460-3. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.01.017. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
10
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems.生态系统的灾难性转变。
Nature. 2001 Oct 11;413(6856):591-6. doi: 10.1038/35098000.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验