Al Shamsi Sulaiman, Naiem Ahmed, Abdelhadi Ibrahim, Al Manei Khalid, Jose Sachin, Al Sukaiti Rashid, Al Hajeri Mahmood, Al Wahaibi Khalifa
Vascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
General Surgery Residency Program, Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Oman.
Oman Med J. 2019 Jul;34(4):283-289. doi: 10.5001/omj.2019.57.
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has surpassed open surgical repair in the management of blunt traumatic aortic injuries (BTAIs) over the past two decades. It is a less morbid procedure associated with lower mortality. We sought to determine the outcomes of early versus delayed TEVAR of BTAI in our population.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected registry that looked at patients presenting with an image-proven diagnosis of BTAI at three tertiary health care facilities in Muscat, Oman. Forty consecutive patients were identified between January 2012 and July 2017, of which four were excluded for incomplete data. The remaining 36 patients were divided based on the timing of repair into early (< 7 days) or delayed ( 7 days) repair. In both cohorts, variables analyzed included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, need for blood products transfusion, use of anti-impulse medications, anticoagulation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and total hospital stay. Primary endpoints included: in-hospital mortality, TEVAR-related morbidity, and the need for reintervention.
Our study subjects were young with a mean age of 33.5±14.8 and 29.9±11.0 years in the early and delayed repair cohorts, respectively. Motor vehicle collisions accounted for the majority of cases (82.6% and 76.9% in early and delayed repair, respectively). Thoracic injuries were the most commonly associated injuries in both early and delayed repair cohorts. Compared to early repair, the delayed repair cohort had a higher incidence of exploratory laparotomies, but the difference was not statistically significant ( 0.161). There were four incidences of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) post-TEVAR; three in the early repair cohort and one in the delayed repair cohort ( 1.000). There was no statistically significant correlation between left subclavian total or partial coverage and the incidence of CVA ( 0.220) and type 1 ( 0.466) or type 2 endoleak ( 0.102). The early repair cohort had a longer but not statistically significant ICU stay (7.8±6.8 vs. 5.3±10.7, 0.386). Prolonged ICU stay was associated with more blood transfusion requirement ( 0.001), and higher respiratory ( 0.010) and gastrointestinal complications ( 0.026).
The short-term outcomes for TEVAR of BTAI continue to show its feasibility in managing BTAI in severely injured patients. There was no clear statistical significance in mortality and morbidity comparing early versus delayed repair. However, our experience is based on a small sample size and short median follow-up but provides a good platform for further analysis.
在过去二十年中,胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)在钝性创伤性主动脉损伤(BTAI)的治疗中已超过开放手术修复。它是一种并发症较少、死亡率较低的手术。我们试图确定在我们的人群中,BTAI早期与延迟TEVAR的治疗结果。
我们对前瞻性收集的登记册进行了回顾性分析,该登记册研究了阿曼马斯喀特三家三级医疗保健机构中经影像学证实诊断为BTAI的患者。在2012年1月至2017年7月期间确定了40例连续患者,其中4例因数据不完整而被排除。其余36例患者根据修复时间分为早期(<7天)或延迟(≥7天)修复。在两个队列中,分析的变量包括患者人口统计学、损伤机制、损伤严重程度评分、输血需求、抗冲击药物的使用、抗凝、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和总住院时间。主要终点包括:住院死亡率、TEVAR相关并发症以及再次干预的需求。
我们的研究对象很年轻,早期和延迟修复队列的平均年龄分别为33.5±14.8岁和29.9±11.0岁。机动车碰撞占大多数病例(早期和延迟修复分别为82.6%和76.9%)。胸部损伤是早期和延迟修复队列中最常见的相关损伤。与早期修复相比,延迟修复队列的剖腹探查发生率更高,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.161)。TEVAR术后有4例脑血管意外(CVA);早期修复队列中有3例,延迟修复队列中有1例(P=1.000)。左锁骨下动脉完全或部分覆盖与CVA发生率(P=0.220)、1型(P=0.466)或2型内漏(P=0.102)之间无统计学显著相关性。早期修复队列的ICU住院时间较长,但无统计学意义(7.8±6.8天对5.3±10.7天,P=0.386)。ICU住院时间延长与更多的输血需求(P=0.001)、更高的呼吸系统(P=0.010)和胃肠道并发症(P=0.026)相关。
BTAI的TEVAR短期结果继续显示其在治疗严重受伤患者的BTAI中的可行性。早期与延迟修复在死亡率和并发症方面没有明显的统计学差异。然而,我们的经验基于小样本量和较短的中位随访时间,但为进一步分析提供了一个良好的平台。