Suppr超能文献

钝性创伤性主动脉损伤的早期与延迟胸主动脉腔内修复:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Early Versus Delayed Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Rudra Pranathi, Cardoso Rayner, Echevarria Sophia, Kaya Berfin, Abdullah Ramal, Baskara Salian Rishabh, Bhindar Shah Zaib, Zerin Annu, Patel Tirath, Abdin Zain, Al-Tawil Mohammed

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, IND.

Medical School, All India Institue of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41078. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41078. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Blunt aortic injury is the second most prevalent cause of patient fatalities post-trauma, closely following head injuries as the leading cause. In recent years, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has evidently improved survival rates and reduced complications in patients suffering from blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) in comparison to open surgery and non-operative management. It is difficult to characterize the appropriate criteria for the timing of TEVAR, whether early or delayed for BTAI, considering the discrepancies related to timing. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase, were searched through April 2023. The primary outcomes were short-term mortality and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Time to TEVAR, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, delayed stroke, and renal failure were also evaluated. We included a total of seven studies, comprising 4177 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Short-term mortality was significantly higher in the early TEVAR group (RR: 1.86; 95% confidence interval (CI); (1.26-2.74); p<0.001; I=33%). In contrast, the ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in the early group (mean difference: -2.82 days; 95% CI; (-4.09 - -1.56); p<0.0001; I=55%). There was no significant difference between both groups in the presenting profile or postoperative complications. Patients undergoing delayed TEVAR had markedly lower mortality rates but a longer ICU stay. The need for future studies with more robust designs is imperative to investigate the factors influencing the timing of repair and the associated outcomes.

摘要

钝性主动脉损伤是创伤后患者死亡的第二大常见原因,仅次于头部损伤这一主要原因。近年来,与开放手术和非手术治疗相比,胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)明显提高了钝性创伤性主动脉损伤(BTAI)患者的生存率并减少了并发症。考虑到与时机相关的差异,很难确定TEVAR时机的合适标准,无论是早期还是延迟用于BTAI。检索了包括PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)和Embase在内的电子数据库,检索截至2023年4月。主要结局为短期死亡率以及住院时间和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间。还评估了TEVAR时间、急性呼吸窘迫综合征、脓毒症、深静脉血栓形成、延迟性中风和肾衰竭。我们共纳入了7项研究,包括4177例符合纳入标准的患者。早期TEVAR组的短期死亡率显著更高(RR:1.86;95%置信区间(CI):(1.26 - 2.74);p<0.001;I²=33%)。相比之下,早期组的ICU住院时间显著更短(平均差值:-2.82天;95%CI:(-4.09 - -1.56);p<0.0001;I²=55%)。两组在临床表现或术后并发症方面无显著差异。接受延迟TEVAR的患者死亡率明显较低,但ICU住院时间较长。迫切需要开展设计更严谨的未来研究,以调查影响修复时机的因素及相关结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da90/10375940/4c0d2e8bafec/cureus-0015-00000041078-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验