Nightingale Chandylen L, Steffen Laurie E, Tooze Janet A, Petty William, Danhauer Suzanne C, Badr Hoda, Weaver Kathryn E
Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Glob Adv Health Med. 2019 Jul 17;8:2164956119865160. doi: 10.1177/2164956119865160. eCollection 2019.
Lung cancer patients and their caregivers are at risk for negative health behaviors and poor psychosocial functioning, but few interventions exist that target this population. To inform intervention development, we explored potential targets and interest and concordance in health promotion interventions among lung cancer patients and their caregivers.
Lung cancer patients (n = 18) with a smoking history and their caregivers (n = 15) participated in a cross-sectional, observational survey study (an average of 1 month postdiagnosis) to assess health behaviors, psychosocial functioning, and interest in health promotion interventions. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests examined factors associated with intervention interest. McNemar's test examined concordance in interest.
Many caregivers (40%) reported providing care at least 4 days per week, and over half (53.3%) reported a smoking history. Patients reported high cancer self-blame (mean = 3.1, standard deviation = 0.9, range = 1-4). Patients (55.6%) and caregivers (60%) reported clinically significant depressive symptoms. There was high interest and concordance in interest in cancer education (patients, 77.8%; caregivers, 86.7%) and diet and exercise (patients, 66.7%; caregivers, 80%) interventions. Significantly more caregivers were interested in stress reduction (patients, 53.3%; caregivers, 73.3%; = .05) and yoga (patients, 16.7%; caregivers, 50%; = .03) than patients. Caregivers interested in stress reduction interventions had higher levels of distress than those not interested.
Health promotion interventions are needed and of interest to lung cancer patients and caregivers. Shared interests in interventions suggest dyadic interventions may be appropriate, yet interventions should also address distinct patient and caregiver needs.
肺癌患者及其照料者存在负面健康行为和心理社会功能不佳的风险,但针对这一人群的干预措施很少。为了为干预措施的制定提供信息,我们探讨了肺癌患者及其照料者在健康促进干预措施中的潜在目标、兴趣和一致性。
有吸烟史的肺癌患者(n = 18)及其照料者(n = 15)参与了一项横断面观察性调查研究(诊断后平均1个月),以评估健康行为、心理社会功能以及对健康促进干预措施的兴趣。Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验用于检查与干预兴趣相关的因素。McNemar检验用于检查兴趣的一致性。
许多照料者(40%)报告每周至少提供4天的护理,超过一半(53.3%)报告有吸烟史。患者报告有较高的癌症自责感(平均 = 3.1,标准差 = 0.9,范围 = 1 - 4)。患者(55.6%)和照料者(60%)报告有临床显著的抑郁症状。对癌症教育干预措施(患者,77.8%;照料者,86.7%)以及饮食和运动干预措施(患者,66.7%;照料者,80%)的兴趣和一致性都很高。对照料者来说,对应激缓解(患者,53.3%;照料者,73.3%;P = 0.05)和瑜伽(患者,16.7%;照料者,50%;P = 0.03)的兴趣明显高于患者。对应激缓解干预措施感兴趣的照料者比不感兴趣的照料者有更高的痛苦水平。
肺癌患者和照料者需要健康促进干预措施,并且对其感兴趣。对干预措施的共同兴趣表明二元干预可能是合适的,但干预措施也应满足患者和照料者各自不同的需求。