• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

服务使用者、家庭和同伴支持工作者对心理健康预先指示的看法。

Service user, whānau and peer support workers' perceptions of advance directives for mental health.

机构信息

Centre for Non-Adversarial Justice, Law School, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Faculty of Law, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(6):1296-1305. doi: 10.1111/inm.12637. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1111/inm.12637
PMID:31361087
Abstract

Advance directives allow users of mental health services to make statements for their future care. In New Zealand, use of advance directives is supported by the Health and Disability Commissioner and was identified in the 2012 Blueprint as a key mechanism for service users to advocate for responses they find most helpful. This study used a qualitative descriptive methodology involving focus groups to explore the perceptions of service users, whānau and peer support workers concerning advance directives. Thematic analysis revealed certain belief patterns about what should or could be included in an advance directive, and about how and with whom one should be created. It revealed generally positive perceptions about how they can uphold service users' right to have preferences considered, to plan flexibly around dynamic needs, and about their value and utility. We conclude that advance directives can support services users' expressions of their preferences for care, but they need to be supported by clinicians if they are to realize this potential. Our findings can also inform service provision in New Zealand, and the planned reform of mental health legislation.

摘要

预先指示允许精神卫生服务使用者为未来的护理做出陈述。在新西兰,健康和残疾专员支持使用预先指示,并在 2012 年的蓝图中确定其为服务使用者倡导他们认为最有帮助的反应的关键机制。本研究采用定性描述性方法,包括焦点小组,探讨了服务使用者、whānau 和同伴支持工作者对预先指示的看法。主题分析揭示了关于预先指示中应包含或可以包含哪些内容,以及应如何以及与谁一起创建的某些信念模式。它普遍对如何维护服务使用者考虑其偏好、灵活规划动态需求以及其价值和实用性的权利持积极看法。我们的结论是,预先指示可以支持服务使用者表达他们对护理的偏好,但如果要实现这一潜力,就需要临床医生的支持。我们的研究结果还可以为新西兰的服务提供提供信息,并为精神卫生立法的计划改革提供信息。

相似文献

1
Service user, whānau and peer support workers' perceptions of advance directives for mental health.服务使用者、家庭和同伴支持工作者对心理健康预先指示的看法。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(6):1296-1305. doi: 10.1111/inm.12637. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Service user and clinical perspectives of psychiatric advance directives in New Zealand.新西兰精神科预嘱的服务使用者和临床视角。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Dec;24(6):554-60. doi: 10.1111/inm.12157. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
3
The content of Mental Health Advance Preference statements (MAPs): An assessment of completed advance directives in one New Zealand health board.心理健康优先意愿书(MAPs)的内容:对新西兰一个卫生局中已完成的预嘱进行的评估。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jan-Feb;68:101537. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101537. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
4
A MAP to mental health: the process of creating a collaborative advance preferences instrument.心理健康指南:创建协作性预先偏好工具的过程
N Z Med J. 2018 Nov 30;131(1486):18-26.
5
Psychiatric advance directives: qualitative study of informed deliberations by mental health service users.精神科预先指示:对精神卫生服务使用者知情审议的定性研究
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;186:247-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.3.247.
6
Advance healthcare directives in mental health: A qualitative analysis from a Spanish healthcare professional's viewpoint.精神健康中的预先医疗指示:来自西班牙医疗保健专业人员视角的定性分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Sep;26(7-8):223-232. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12539. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Mental Health Service Users' Perspectives on Psychiatric Advance Directives: A Systematic Review.精神卫生服务使用者对精神科预嘱的看法:系统评价。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Apr 1;74(4):381-392. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202200003. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
8
Reasons for endorsing or rejecting self-binding directives in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study of survey responses from UK service users.支持或反对双相情感障碍患者自我约束指令的原因:来自英国服务使用者调查回应的定性研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):599-609. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00115-2. Epub 2021 May 21.
9
Promoting and hindering factors in the use of advance statements by Australian mental health clinicians.澳大利亚精神健康临床医生使用预立医疗指示的促进和阻碍因素。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Aug;30(4):743-760. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12901. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
10
Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness.便利的精神科预先指示:一项针对严重精神疾病患者促进预先治疗规划干预措施的随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1943-51. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1943.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of Psychiatric Advance Directives Into the Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record: Exploring the Promise and Limitations.将精神科预立医疗指示纳入患者可访问的电子健康记录:探索前景与局限
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 18;27:e68549. doi: 10.2196/68549.
2
Advance Statements for Black African and Caribbean people (AdStAC): protocol for an implementation study.黑非洲人和加勒比人群体的预先指示(AdStAC):一项实施研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 17;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04825-6.