Raleigh Orthopaedic Clinic, Raleigh, NC.
Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 15;45(18):1247-1252. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003176.
Randomized controlled trial.
The aim of this study was to determine whether postoperative blood salvage and autotransfusion versus traditional closed suction drainage reduces the rate of homologous blood transfusions in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity.
The use of intraoperative blood salvage has become commonplace in spine surgery; however, the collection and reinfusion of blood drained from the wound postoperatively have not been employed routinely because of increased cost and questionable benefit.
Adult patients undergoing long posterior fusions were randomized to either a blood salvage and reinfusion system (OrthoPat - Group 1) or a standard subfascial closed suction drain (Group 2). Blood collected in Group 1 was reinfused according to the manufacturer's protocol. Reinfusion drains were converted to standard closed suction drains when output was <50 mL during 4 hours, and drains were removed when output was minimal. Patients received autologous or homologous blood transfusions when hemoglobin (Hg) <8 g/dL or they had symptomatic anemia.
Thirty-four patients were randomized into Group 1 and 36 patients into Group 2. There were no differences in preoperative or intraoperative parameters. Patients in Group 1 had higher hemoglobin levels on postoperative day (POD) 2 and POD 3 compared to those in Group 2. However, there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients requiring homologous blood transfusion between the two groups (41% Group 1 vs. 60% Group 2, P = 0.17). Similarly a subgroup analysis in patients with estimated blood loss >2000 mL also showed no difference in homologous blood transfusion rates (67% Group 1 vs. 76% Group 2, P = 0.58). There were no differences in the rate or type of postoperative complications.
Postoperative blood salvage and reinfusion result in a higher hemoglobin level in the early postoperative period, but does not significantly reduce the need for homologous blood transfusion.
随机对照试验。
本研究旨在确定在接受成人脊柱畸形手术的患者中,与传统的闭式引流相比,术后血液回收和自体输血是否降低同种异体输血率。
术中血液回收在脊柱手术中已广泛应用;然而,由于成本增加和效益存疑,术后从伤口中收集和再输入血液并未常规应用。
接受长后路融合术的成年患者被随机分为血液回收和再输注系统组(OrthoPat-组 1)或标准皮下闭式引流组(组 2)。组 1 中收集的血液根据制造商的方案进行再输注。当 4 小时内输出量<50ml 时,将再输注引流管转换为标准闭式引流管,当输出量最小化时将引流管取出。当血红蛋白(Hg)<8g/dL 或出现症状性贫血时,患者接受自体或同种异体输血。
34 例患者被随机分为组 1,36 例患者被随机分为组 2。两组患者术前或术中参数无差异。与组 2 相比,组 1 患者术后第 2 天和第 3 天的血红蛋白水平更高。然而,两组患者需要同种异体输血的比例无显著差异(组 1 为 41%,组 2 为 60%,P=0.17)。同样,对估计出血量>2000ml 的患者进行亚组分析,同种异体输血率也无差异(组 1 为 67%,组 2 为 76%,P=0.58)。两组术后并发症的发生率或类型无差异。
术后血液回收和再输注可使术后早期血红蛋白水平升高,但并不能显著降低同种异体输血的需求。
1。