Miller Megan M, Williams Amy E, Zapolski Tamika C B, Rand Kevin L, Hirsh Adam T
Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Pain. 2020 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):225-237. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
Previous studies have documented that racial minorities and women receive poorer pain care than their demographic counterparts. Providers contribute to these disparities when their pain-related decision-making systematically varies across patient groups. Less is known about racial and gender disparities in children with pain or the extent to which providers contribute to these disparities. In a sample of 129 medical students (henceforth referred to as "providers"), Virtual Human methodology and a pain-related version of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) were used to examine the effects of patient race/gender on providers' pain assessment/treatment decisions for pediatric chronic abdominal pain, as well as the moderating role of provider implicit pain-related race/gender attitudes. Findings indicated that providers rated Black patients as more distressed (mean difference [MD] = 2.33, P < .01, standard error [SE] = .71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .92, 3.73) and as experiencing more pain-related interference (MD = 3.14, P < .01, SE = .76, 95% CI = 1.63, 4.64) compared to White patients. Providers were more likely to recommend opioids for Black patients than White patients (MD = 2.41, P < .01, SE = .58, 95% CI = 1.05, 3.76). Female patients were perceived to be more distressed by their pain (MD = 2.14, P < .01, SE = .79, 95% CI = .58, 3.70) than male patients, however there were no gender differences in treatment recommendations. IAT results indicated that providers held implicit attitudes that Black Americans (M = .19, standard deviation [SD] = .29) and males (M = .38, SD = .29) were more pain-tolerant than their demographic counterparts; however, these implicit attitudes did not significantly moderate their pain assessment/treatment decisions. Future studies are needed to elucidate specific paths through which the pain experience and care of children differ across racial and gender groups. PERSPECTIVE: Providers' pain assessment (ie, pain distress/pain interference) and treatment (ie, opioids) of pediatric pain differs across patient race and to a lesser extent, patient gender. This study represents a critical step in research on pain-related disparities in pediatric pain.
以往的研究表明,少数族裔和女性所接受的疼痛治疗比同属该人口统计学特征的其他人要差。当医疗服务提供者在做出与疼痛相关的决策时,系统性地因患者群体不同而存在差异,就会导致这些差异。对于患有疼痛的儿童中的种族和性别差异,以及医疗服务提供者导致这些差异的程度,人们了解得较少。在一个由129名医科学生(以下简称“医疗服务提供者”)组成的样本中,使用虚拟人方法和疼痛相关版本的内隐联想测验(IAT),来研究患者种族/性别对医疗服务提供者针对小儿慢性腹痛的疼痛评估/治疗决策的影响,以及医疗服务提供者内隐的与疼痛相关的种族/性别态度的调节作用。研究结果表明,与白人患者相比,医疗服务提供者认为黑人患者的痛苦程度更高(平均差[MD]=2.33,P<.01,标准误[SE]=.71,95%置信区间[CI]=.92,3.73),且经历的与疼痛相关的干扰更多(MD=3.14,P<.01,SE=.76,95%CI=1.63,4.64)。与白人患者相比,医疗服务提供者更有可能为黑人患者推荐阿片类药物(MD=2.41,P<.01,SE=.58,95%CI=1.05,3.76)。与男性患者相比,女性患者被认为因疼痛而更痛苦(MD=2.14,P<.01,SE=.79,95%CI=.58,3.70),然而在治疗建议方面没有性别差异。IAT结果表明,医疗服务提供者持有这样的内隐态度,即美国黑人(M=.19,标准差[SD]=.29)和男性(M=.38,SD=.29)比同属该人口统计学特征的其他人更能耐受疼痛;然而,这些内隐态度并没有显著调节他们的疼痛评估/治疗决策。未来需要开展研究,以阐明不同种族和性别群体在儿童疼痛体验和护理方面存在差异的具体途径。观点:医疗服务提供者对小儿疼痛的评估(即疼痛痛苦程度/疼痛干扰程度)和治疗(即阿片类药物)因患者种族不同而存在差异,因患者性别不同而存在的差异较小。这项研究是小儿疼痛相关差异研究中的关键一步。