Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e371-e378. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.161. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
Deciding to treat unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) involves discussion with patients about outcomes data and personal attitudes toward risk of rupture versus procedural complication risk. We performed a qualitative analysis of online interpatient discussions to investigate perspectives on medical decision making.
On an aneurysm-specific forum, we identified patient conversation threads created between December 3, 2016 and December 3, 2018 containing discussion of medical decision making. These threads were analyzed using an adapted grounded-theory approach. Two researchers coded each thread and discussed discrepancies until consensus was reached. Coded content was analyzed to identify emergent themes.
We analyzed 40 threads from a foundation-sponsored intracranial aneurysm-specific patient forum in the public domain. There were 110 user accounts, contributing 527 posts of average length 108 words. Fifty-seven users described diagnosis of UIA without history of rupture, and 20 described presentation with rupture. Patients 1) felt fortunate for diagnosis with UIA but were challenged by decision making and concern for rupture, 2) desired treatment by providers with large case volumes, clear communication, and an unbiased approach to decision making, 3) acted on qualitative understandings of individual risk, 4) considered psychological, social, and clinical factors in forming preferences for management, 5) sought information for purposes other than informing decision making, and 6) regained control through decision-making processes.
This is the first ethnographic account of decision making among patients with UIAs. Newly diagnosed patients explored treatment options using online forums. They faced ambiguity in identifying optimal management, creating apprehension and decisional conflict. Further research is required to improve risk communication and individualized decision making for patients with UIAs.
决定是否治疗未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)涉及与患者讨论结果数据以及对破裂风险与程序并发症风险的个人态度。我们对在线患者间的讨论进行了定性分析,以调查对医疗决策的看法。
在一个动脉瘤特定的论坛上,我们确定了 2016 年 12 月 3 日至 2018 年 12 月 3 日之间创建的包含医疗决策讨论的患者对话线程。这些线程使用经过改编的扎根理论方法进行分析。两位研究人员对每个线程进行编码,并讨论差异,直到达成共识。对编码内容进行分析以确定新出现的主题。
我们分析了一个由基金会赞助的颅内动脉瘤特定患者论坛中的 40 个线程,这些线程是公共领域中的。有 110 个用户帐户,贡献了 527 条平均长度为 108 字的帖子。57 名患者描述了 UIA 的诊断,而没有破裂的病史,20 名患者描述了破裂的出现。患者 1)感到幸运的是被诊断为 UIA,但面临决策的挑战和对破裂的担忧,2)希望由具有大量病例量、清晰沟通和对决策不偏不倚的提供者进行治疗,3)根据对个人风险的定性理解采取行动,4)在形成管理偏好时考虑心理、社会和临床因素,5)寻求信息的目的不仅仅是为了做出决策,6)通过决策过程重新获得控制。
这是对 UIA 患者决策的第一次民族志描述。新诊断的患者使用在线论坛探索治疗选择。他们在确定最佳治疗方案时面临着不确定性,这引起了他们的焦虑和决策冲突。需要进一步研究以改善 UIA 患者的风险沟通和个体化决策。