Suppr超能文献

卵巢癌复发的二次肿瘤细胞减灭术:缓解与复发的困境——残留病灶或复发病灶的预后是否不同?

Secondary debulking for ovarian carcinoma relapse: The R-R dilemma – is the prognosis different for residual or recurrent disease?

作者信息

Spiliotis John D., Iavazzo Christos, Kopanakis Nikolaos D., Christopoulou Athina

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology and HIPEC, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece

Department of Surgical Oncology and HIPEC, European Interbalkan Medical Centre, Thessaloniki, Greece

出版信息

J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2019 Nov 28;20(4):213-217. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2019.2018.0165. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the kind of ovarian cancer relapse by separating residual from recurrent disease and correlating them with patient survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 200 women with ovarian carcinoma relapse between 2005 and 2017.

RESULTS

The main sites of residual disease included the great omentum, epiploic appendices, liver round ligament, gallbladder, and cervical/vaginal stump. The median survival for women with residual disease treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) + systemic chemotherapy was 38 months compared with the control group, which reached 23.8 months. The morbidity rates were 18% vs 7%, respectively, and the mortality rates were 2.5% vs 1.3%. The main sites of recurrent disease included the mesenterium, pelvic floor, diaphragm, and Glisson’s capsule. Women with recurrent disease treated with CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy had median survival rates of 26 months vs 16 months in the control group. The morbidity rates were 22% vs 15%, respectively, and the mortality rates were 3.3% vs 0%.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing secondary debulking plus HIPEC for ovarian carcinoma relapse have a different prognosis when compared with patients with residual and recurrent disease. A different prognosis is presented in women undergoing secondary debulking plus HIPEC for ovarian carcinoma relapse when comparing patients with residual and recurrent disease.

摘要

目的

通过区分残留病灶与复发疾病,并将它们与患者生存率相关联,分析卵巢癌复发的类型。

材料与方法

这是一项对2005年至2017年间200例卵巢癌复发患者的回顾性研究。

结果

残留病灶的主要部位包括大网膜、网膜附件、肝圆韧带、胆囊以及宫颈/阴道残端。接受细胞减灭术(CRS)+腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)+全身化疗的残留病灶患者的中位生存期为38个月,而对照组为23.8个月。发病率分别为18%和7%,死亡率分别为2.5%和1.3%。复发疾病的主要部位包括肠系膜、盆底、膈肌和肝门管区。接受CRS+HIPEC+全身化疗的复发疾病患者的中位生存期为26个月,而对照组为16个月。发病率分别为22%和15%,死亡率分别为3.3%和0%。

结论

与残留病灶和复发疾病患者相比,因卵巢癌复发接受二次减瘤术加HIPEC的患者预后不同。在比较残留病灶和复发疾病患者时,因卵巢癌复发接受二次减瘤术加HIPEC的女性患者呈现出不同的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c8/6883755/b736b53572eb/JTGGA-20-213-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验