Suppr超能文献

重症心脏监护病房中,非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者的风险调整早期侵入性策略。

Risk-adjusted early invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in Intensive Cardiac Care Units.

机构信息

Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Cardiológicos, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.

Unidad de Cardiología Intervencionista, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 Nov;44(8):475-484. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines recommend a risk-adjusted early invasive strategy (EIS) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). The present study assesses the application if this strategy, the conditioning factors and prognostic impact upon patients with NSTEACS admitted to Intensive Cardiac Care Units (ICCU).

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study was carried out.

SETTING

The ICCUs of 8 hospitals in Catalonia (Spain).

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with NSTEACS between October 2017 and March 2018. The risk profile was defined by the European Society of Cardiology criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

EIS was defined as the performance of coronary angiography within the first 6hours in patients at very high-risk or within 24hours in high-risk patients.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

Mortality or readmission at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 629 patients were included (mean age 66.6 years), of whom 225 (35.9%) were at very high risk, and 392 (62.6%) at high risk. Most patients (96.2%) underwent an invasive strategy. EIS was performed in 284 patients (45.6%), especially younger patients with fewer comorbidities. These patients had a shorter ICCU and hospital stay, as well as a lesser incidence of ACS, revascularization and death or readmission at 6 months. After adjusting for confounders, the association between EIS and death or readmission at 6 months remained significant (hazard ratio: .66, 95% confidence interval .45-.97; P=.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The EIS was performed in a minority of NSTEACS admitted to ICCU, being associated with better outcomes.

摘要

目的

目前的指南建议对非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTEACS)患者采用风险调整的早期侵入性策略(EIS)。本研究评估了这种策略在 NSTEACS 患者中的应用,以及在 ICU 接受治疗的患者的条件因素和预后影响。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

西班牙加泰罗尼亚的 8 家医院的 ICU。

患者

2017 年 10 月至 2018 年 3 月期间连续就诊的 NSTEACS 患者。风险状况由欧洲心脏病学会标准定义。

干预措施

EIS 定义为极高危患者在最初 6 小时内或高危患者在 24 小时内进行冠状动脉造影。

主要观察指标

6 个月时的死亡率或再入院率。

结果

共纳入 629 例患者(平均年龄 66.6 岁),其中 225 例(35.9%)为极高危患者,392 例(62.6%)为高危患者。大多数患者(96.2%)接受了侵入性策略。284 例(45.6%)患者接受了 EIS,特别是年轻、合并症较少的患者。这些患者 ICU 和住院时间较短,ACS、血运重建和 6 个月时死亡或再入院的发生率较低。在调整混杂因素后,EIS 与 6 个月时死亡或再入院的关联仍然显著(危险比:0.66,95%置信区间:0.45-0.97;P=0.035)。

结论

EIS 在 ICU 收治的 NSTEACS 患者中实施比例较低,但与更好的结局相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验