• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本首部临床研究监管法的实施:背景、概述与挑战

Implementation of Japan's First Clinical Research Regulatory Law: Background, Overview, and Challenges.

作者信息

Akabayashi Akira, Nakazawa Eisuke, Akabayashi Aru

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Ethics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East, 30th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2019 Dec;31(4):283-294. doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09379-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-019-09379-3
PMID:31363880
Abstract

In April 2018, Japan's first law regulating clinical research went into effect. The law aimed to strengthen regulations on research integrity and conflicts of interest, which had been limited under existing administrative guidelines; the law also provided stipulations for legal penalties. The scope of the new regulations, however, is limited entirely to studies that evaluate unapproved drugs or the off-label use of approved drugs, and those that receive funding from companies. On the other hand, the law's application brings numerous complications, including the establishment of new review committees, troublesome procedures for transitioning studies that are currently underway, and ambiguities about the scope of what constitutes best efforts. Thus, the change has led to substantial strain and confusion in the field. This paper offers an overview of the law and its background, and discusses its future prospects from the practical standpoint of managing ethics committees and providing research ethics support in the field.

摘要

2018年4月,日本首部规范临床研究的法律生效。该法律旨在加强对研究诚信和利益冲突的监管,而这在现行行政指南下一直受到限制;该法律还规定了法律处罚措施。然而,新规定的范围完全限于评估未经批准药物或已批准药物的非标签使用的研究,以及接受公司资助的研究。另一方面,该法律的实施带来了诸多复杂问题,包括设立新的审查委员会、当前正在进行的研究过渡的繁琐程序,以及关于尽最大努力范围的模糊性。因此,这一变化给该领域带来了巨大压力和混乱。本文概述了该法律及其背景,并从管理伦理委员会和在该领域提供研究伦理支持的实际角度讨论了其未来前景。

相似文献

1
Implementation of Japan's First Clinical Research Regulatory Law: Background, Overview, and Challenges.日本首部临床研究监管法的实施:背景、概述与挑战
HEC Forum. 2019 Dec;31(4):283-294. doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09379-3.
2
Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations.挑战 COVID-19 期间及以后临床伦理支持的误解:法律更新及未来思考。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Aug;47(8):549-552. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107092. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
The present status of ethics committees in Japan's 80 medical schools.日本80所医学院校伦理委员会的现状
HEC Forum. 1989;1(4):221-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00122366.
4
Ethics committees in Croatia in the healthcare institutions: the first study about their structure and functions, and some reflections on the major issues and problems.克罗地亚医疗机构中的伦理委员会:关于其结构与功能的首次研究,以及对主要问题的一些思考
HEC Forum. 2006 Mar;18(1):49-60. doi: 10.1007/s10730-006-7987-4.
5
Hospital based ethics, current situation in France: between "Espaces" and committees.基于医院的伦理,法国的现状:介于“空间”与委员会之间。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Sep;32(9):503-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.015271.
6
[Legal repercussions of Clinical Ethics Committees reports].[临床伦理委员会报告的法律影响]
Rev Med Chil. 2006 Apr;134(4):517-9. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872006000400016. Epub 2006 May 25.
7
Legal aspects of clinical ethics committees.临床伦理委员会的法律问题。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i50-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i50.
8
Japan's new Mental Health Law: more light shed on dark places?日本新的《精神卫生法》:能否照亮黑暗角落?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1991;14(3):137-68. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(91)90001-4.
9
What is the role of ethics committees after Regulation (EU) 536/2014?2014年欧盟第536/2014号法规实施后,伦理委员会的作用是什么?
J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):186-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103028. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
10
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomedicine. Faulty drug trials tarnish Japan's clinical research.生物医学。存在缺陷的药物试验损害了日本的临床研究。
Science. 2014 Jul 4;345(6192):17. doi: 10.1126/science.345.6192.17.
2
Former Novartis employee arrested over valsartan data.诺华前雇员因缬沙坦数据被捕。
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2111. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61015-1.
3
Research misconduct and scientific integrity: a call for a global forum.研究不当行为与科学诚信:呼吁建立全球论坛。
Lancet. 2013 Sep 14;382(9896):940. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61933-9.
4
Japan. Tampered data cast shadow on drug trial.日本。篡改的数据给药物试验蒙上阴影。
Science. 2013 Jul 19;341(6143):223. doi: 10.1126/science.341.6143.223.
5
A five year follow-up national study of ethics committees in medical organizations in Japan.日本医疗机构伦理委员会的一项为期五年的全国性跟踪研究。
HEC Forum. 2008 Mar;20(1):49-60. doi: 10.1007/s10730-008-9059-4.
6
An eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan.日本医学院校及综合医院伦理委员会的一项为期八年的全国性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Jun 29;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-8.
7
Conflict of interest: a Japanese perspective.利益冲突:日本视角
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2005 Summer;14(3):277-80. doi: 10.1017/s0963180105050371.
8
Administrative legislation in Japan: guidelines on scientific and ethical standards.日本的行政立法:科学与伦理标准指南
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2004 Summer;13(3):245-53. doi: 10.1017/s0963180104133070.