Counseling Psychology Program, Department of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations, College of Education, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Dec;6(6):1192-1199. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00620-w. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
Substance use disorders (SUDs) pose a significant public health concern. Previous findings, while equivocal, demonstrate screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is effective in reducing substance use and improving overall health. While race/ethnic and sex differences in SBIRT outcomes exist, racial/ethnic differences within sex groups remain unclear. The present study sought to quantify differences within race/ethnicity and sex in drug and alcohol use following SBIRT screenings.
Using health service data (N = 29,121) from a Midwestern state in four federally qualified health centers (FQHC) from 2012 to 2016, we assessed racial/ethnic and sex differences in the effect of SBIRT screening on alcohol and drug use between visits. We used McNemar's tests and multiple logistic regression to predict substance use at follow-up visits.
We found a significant race/ethnicity by sex interaction predicting a positive alcohol prescreening (p < 0.001), precipitating a full alcohol screening, and subsequent hazardous drinking (p < 0.001) at full alcohol screening follow-up. Black males demonstrated the largest reduction in positive alcohol prescreenings at follow-up (9.24%). Patients identifying as White, Black, or Other demonstrated a reduction in hazardous drinking, though effect sizes were small and not clinically meaningful. No interactions in our drug outcome models were significant.
SBIRT is useful in addressing health services equity among Black and male populations. Public health policy should support universal substance use screening and targeting interventions for underserved groups in clinical facilities likely to benefit the most. Resources should be directed to groups with the most pressing SUD treatment needs.
物质使用障碍(SUD)是一个重大的公共卫生问题。尽管之前的研究结果存在争议,但筛查、简短干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)确实可以有效减少物质使用并改善整体健康状况。尽管在 SBIRT 结果方面存在种族/民族和性别差异,但性别的种族/民族差异仍不清楚。本研究旨在量化 SBIRT 筛查后药物和酒精使用方面的种族/民族和性别的差异。
使用来自中西部一个州的四个合格的联邦健康中心(FQHC)的健康服务数据(N=29,121),从 2012 年到 2016 年,我们评估了 SBIRT 筛查对男女之间酒精和药物使用的影响在访问之间的种族/民族和性别差异。我们使用 McNemar 检验和多因素逻辑回归来预测随访时的物质使用情况。
我们发现种族/民族与性别之间存在显著的相互作用,这预测了酒精预筛查的阳性结果(p<0.001)、进行完整的酒精筛查以及随后的危险饮酒(p<0.001)在完整的酒精筛查随访中。黑人男性在随访中表现出阳性酒精预筛查的最大减少(9.24%)。自我认同为白人、黑人或其他种族的患者表现出危险饮酒的减少,尽管效果大小较小且无临床意义。我们的药物结果模型中没有显著的相互作用。
SBIRT 在解决黑人和男性人群的健康服务公平性方面是有用的。公共卫生政策应支持在临床设施中对所有人群进行普遍的物质使用筛查,并针对服务不足的群体进行针对性干预,这可能使最需要的人受益。资源应针对最迫切需要物质使用障碍治疗的群体进行定向。