1 Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany.
2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519858311. doi: 10.1177/2331216519858311.
This study compared spatial speech-in-noise performance in two cochlear implant (CI) patient groups: bimodal listeners, who use a hearing aid contralaterally to support their impaired acoustic hearing, and listeners with contralateral normal hearing, i.e., who were single-sided deaf before implantation. Using a laboratory setting that controls for head movements and that simulates spatial acoustic scenes, speech reception thresholds were measured for frontal speech-in-stationary noise from the front, the left, or the right side. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was then extracted from speech reception thresholds for monaural and binaural listening. SRM was found to be significantly lower in bimodal CI than in CI single-sided deaf listeners. Within each listener group, the SRM extracted from monaural listening did not differ from the SRM extracted from binaural listening. In contrast, a normal-hearing control group showed a significant improvement in SRM when using two ears in comparison to one. Neither CI group showed a binaural summation effect; that is, their performance was not improved by using two devices instead of the best monaural device in each spatial scenario. The results confirm a "listening with the better ear" strategy in the two CI patient groups, where patients benefited from using two ears/devices instead of one by selectively attending to the better one. Which one is the better ear, however, depends on the spatial scenario and on the individual configuration of hearing loss.
本研究比较了两组人工耳蜗植入(CI)患者的空间言语噪声识别表现:使用对侧助听器辅助其受损的声学听力的双耳模式患者,以及对侧听力正常的患者,即在植入前为单侧聋。通过使用实验室环境控制头部运动并模拟空间声学场景,从前、左、右三个方向测量了正面语音在固定噪声中的语音接收阈值。然后从单耳和双耳聆听的语音接收阈值中提取了掩蔽释放(SRM)。结果发现,双耳模式 CI 患者的 SRM 明显低于单侧聋 CI 患者。在每个患者组内,从单耳聆听中提取的 SRM 与从双耳聆听中提取的 SRM 没有差异。相比之下,正常听力对照组在双耳聆听时与单耳聆听时相比,SRM 有显著提高。两个 CI 组均未表现出双耳总和效应;也就是说,在每个空间场景中,他们的表现并没有因使用两个设备而不是每个空间场景中最好的单耳设备而得到改善。研究结果证实了两组 CI 患者中存在“用更好的耳朵聆听”的策略,患者通过选择性地关注更好的耳朵/设备,从使用双耳/设备中受益。然而,哪只耳朵更好,则取决于空间场景和听力损失的个体配置。