• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常组织并发症概率模型在质子治疗脑肿瘤患儿计划评估中的应用。

Normal tissue complication probability models in plan evaluation of children with brain tumors referred to proton therapy.

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway.

Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2019 Oct;58(10):1416-1422. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1643496. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2019.1643496
PMID:31364899
Abstract

Children with brain tumors undergoing radiotherapy are at particular risk of radiation-induced morbidity and are therefore routinely considered for proton therapy (PT) to reduce the dose to healthy tissues. The aim of this study was to apply pediatric constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models when evaluating the differences between PT and contemporary photon-based radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Forty patients (aged 1-17 years) referred from Norwegian institutions to cranial PT abroad during 2014-2016 were selected for VMAT re-planning using the original CT sets and target volumes. The VMAT and delivered PT plans were compared by dose/volume metrics and NTCP models related to growth hormone deficiency, auditory toxicity, visual impairment, xerostomia, neurocognitive outcome and secondary brain and parotid gland cancers. The supratentorial brain, temporal lobes, hippocampi, hypothalamus, pituitary glands, cochleas, salivary glands, optic nerves and chiasm received lower mean doses from PT. Reductions in population median NTCP were significant for auditory toxicity (VMAT: 3.8%; PT: 0.3%), neurocognitive outcome (VMAT: 3.0 IQ points decline at 5 years post RT; PT: 2.5 IQ points), xerostomia (VMAT: 2.0%; PT: 0.6%), excess absolute risk of secondary cancer of the brain (VMAT: 9.2%; PT: 6.7%) and salivary glands (VMAT: 2.8%; PT:0.5%). Across all patients, 23/38 PT plans had better or comparable estimated risks for all endpoints (within ±10% of the risk relative to VMAT), whereas for 1/38 patients all estimates were better or comparable with VMAT. PT reduced the volumes of normal tissues exposed to radiation, particularly low-to-intermediate dose levels, and this was reflected in lower NTCP. Of the included endpoints, substantial reductions in population medians were seen from the delivered PT plans for auditory complications, xerostomia, and risk of secondary cancers of the brain and salivary glands.

摘要

正在接受放射治疗的脑瘤儿童特别容易受到放射性并发症的影响,因此通常会考虑采用质子治疗 (PT) 来降低健康组织的剂量。本研究旨在应用儿科限制和正常组织并发症概率 (NTCP) 模型来评估 PT 与当代光子放射治疗(容积调强弧形治疗,VMAT)之间的差异。

2014-2016 年间,从挪威各机构转诊至国外进行颅 PT 的 40 名(年龄 1-17 岁)患者,使用原始 CT 集和靶区重新规划 VMAT。通过剂量/体积指标和与生长激素缺乏、听觉毒性、视力损害、口干症、神经认知结果以及继发性脑和腮腺癌相关的 NTCP 模型比较 VMAT 和已交付的 PT 计划。PT 使幕上脑、颞叶、海马体、下丘脑、垂体、耳蜗、唾液腺、视神经和视交叉接收到的平均剂量更低。听觉毒性(VMAT:3.8%;PT:0.3%)、神经认知结果(VMAT:5 年 RT 后 3 个 IQ 点下降;PT:2.5 个 IQ 点)、口干症(VMAT:2.0%;PT:0.6%)、脑和唾液腺继发性癌症的超额绝对风险(VMAT:9.2%;PT:6.7%)的人群中位数 NTCP 降低有显著统计学意义。在所有患者中,23/38 例 PT 计划对于所有终点的估计风险更好或相当(与 VMAT 相比,风险相差在±10%范围内),而对于 1/38 例患者,所有估计值与 VMAT 相比均更好或相当。

PT 降低了暴露于辐射的正常组织的体积,尤其是低至中等剂量水平,这反映在较低的 NTCP 上。在所包括的终点中,从已交付的 PT 计划中,人群中位数在听觉并发症、口干症以及脑和唾液腺继发性癌症风险方面均有显著降低。

相似文献

1
Normal tissue complication probability models in plan evaluation of children with brain tumors referred to proton therapy.正常组织并发症概率模型在质子治疗脑肿瘤患儿计划评估中的应用。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Oct;58(10):1416-1422. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1643496. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Intensity-modulated proton therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 3D conformal radiotherapy in anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma : A dosimetric comparison.间变性星形细胞瘤和胶质母细胞瘤的调强质子治疗、容积调强弧形治疗和三维适形放疗:剂量学比较
Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Nov;192(11):770-779. doi: 10.1007/s00066-016-1007-7. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
3
Intensity modulated proton therapy compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy in the irradiation of young female patients with hodgkin's lymphoma. Assessment of risk of toxicity and secondary cancer induction.调强质子治疗与容积旋转调强弧形治疗在霍奇金淋巴瘤年轻女性患者放疗中的比较。毒性和继发癌症诱导风险评估。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1462-2.
4
Impact of setup and range uncertainties on TCP and NTCP following VMAT or IMPT of oropharyngeal cancer patients.头颈部肿瘤 VMAT 或 IMPT 治疗中摆位和靶区范围不确定性对 TCP 和 NTCP 的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2019 Apr 23;64(9):095001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1459.
5
Comparison of Multiple Treatment Planning Techniques for High-Grade Glioma Tumors Near to Critical Organs.比较临近关键器官的高级别胶质瘤肿瘤的多种治疗计划技术。
Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41(9):514-519. doi: 10.1159/000487642. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
6
Dosimetric comparison of advanced radiotherapy approaches using photon techniques and particle therapy in the postoperative management of thymoma.应用光子技术和粒子疗法的先进放疗方法在胸腺瘤术后管理中的剂量学比较。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Dec;57(12):1713-1720. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1502467. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
7
Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.头颈部癌中,点扫描质子治疗与容积调强弧形光子治疗在危及器官保护和计划稳健性方面的比较。
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6589-98. doi: 10.1118/1.4933245.
8
Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.点扫描质子弧形治疗可降低口咽癌患者的毒性。
Med Phys. 2023 Mar;50(3):1305-1317. doi: 10.1002/mp.16098. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
9
Estimation of Risk of Normal-tissue Toxicity Following Gastric Cancer Radiotherapy with Photon- or Scanned Proton-beams.胃癌放疗中使用光子束或扫描质子束后正常组织毒性风险的评估。
Anticancer Res. 2018 May;38(5):2619-2625. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12503.
10
Towards proton arc therapy: physical and biologically equivalent doses with increasing number of beams in pediatric brain irradiation.朝向质子弧形治疗:在儿科脑照射中,随着射束数量的增加,物理剂量和生物等效剂量。
Acta Oncol. 2019 Oct;58(10):1451-1456. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1639823. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric CNS Radiation Oncology: Recent Developments and Novel Techniques.小儿中枢神经系统放射肿瘤学:最新进展与新技术
Curr Oncol. 2025 Mar 20;32(3):180. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32030180.
2
Illuminating the hidden cost: A systematic review of cognitive late effects regarding cancer-related fatigue in treated paediatric brain tumors.揭示隐藏的代价:关于接受治疗的小儿脑肿瘤中与癌症相关疲劳的认知晚期效应的系统评价
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Dec 9;33:100291. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100291. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors.
粒子放射治疗在颅底肿瘤治疗中的作用。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 7;13:1161752. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161752. eCollection 2023.
4
The relevance of ototoxicity induced by radiotherapy.放疗引起耳毒性的相关性。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jun 3;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02268-7.
5
Neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric brain tumors after treatment with proton versus photon radiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.质子与光子放疗治疗儿童脑肿瘤的神经认知结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;19(8):727-740. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00726-6. Epub 2023 May 8.
6
Dosimetric analysis and biological evaluation between proton radiotherapy and photon radiotherapy for the long target of total esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌全靶区质子放疗与光子放疗的剂量学分析及生物学评价
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 3;12:954187. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.954187. eCollection 2022.
7
A scoping review of patient selection methods for proton therapy.质子治疗患者选择方法的范围综述。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Mar;69(1):108-121. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.540. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
8
Neurocognitive impairment following proton therapy for paediatric brain tumour: a systematic review of post-therapy assessments.质子治疗儿童脑肿瘤后的神经认知功能障碍:治疗后评估的系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jun;29(6):3035-3047. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05808-z. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
9
Influence of Target Location, Size, and Patient Age on Normal Tissue Sparing- Proton and Photon Therapy in Paediatric Brain Tumour Patient-Specific Approach.靶区位置、大小及患者年龄对儿童脑肿瘤患者正常组织保护的影响——质子和光子治疗的个体化方法
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 10;12(9):2578. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092578.