Suppr超能文献

高危 HIV 暴露婴儿 6 周新生儿三联抗逆转录病毒暴露后预防的安全性。

Safety of 6-week Neonatal Triple-combination Antiretroviral Postexposure Prophylaxis in High-risk HIV-exposed Infants.

机构信息

From the Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine.

Center of Excellence for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 Oct;38(10):1045-1050. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002426.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combination antiretroviral drug regimens are increasingly preferred for neonatal postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) among HIV-exposed infants with high-risk of transmission. We evaluated the adverse events associated with the use of zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine (3TC)/nevirapine (NVP) for neonatal PEP during the first 6 weeks of life.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of non-breast-fed HIV-exposed infants was conducted at 5 clinical sites in Thailand. Study population included 100 high-risk HIV-exposed infants (maternal HIV RNA > 50 copies/mL prior to delivery or received antiretroviral therapy less than 12 weeks) and 100 low-risk HIV-exposed neonates. High-risk infants received ZDV/3TC/NVP for 6 weeks whereas low-risk HIV-exposed neonates received a 4-week regimen of ZDV. Complete blood count, aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase were assessed at birth, 1, 2 and 4 months of life.

RESULTS

From October 2015 to November 2017, 200 infants were enrolled, of which 18.5% had low birth weight < 2500 g. The proportion of infants with anemia grade 2 or higher at 1 and 2 months of life between ZDV/3TC/NVP and ZDV prophylaxis was 48.5% vs 32.3% (P=0.02); nevertheless, severe anemia (grade 3) was not significantly different; 9.2% vs 10.2% (P=0.81), respectively. At 1 month old, infants on ZDV/3TC/NVP prophylaxis had significantly higher grade 2 anemia versus infants on ZDV alone (33.0% vs 13.4%; P=0.001); however, no difference was observed at 2 months old. No differences in neutropenia or hepatotoxicity between infant prophylactic regimens were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple antiretroviral neonatal PEP with ZDV/3TC/NVP for 6 weeks in high-risk HIV-exposed infants did not significantly increase the risk of short-term toxicity compared with ZDV-monotherapy prophylaxis.

摘要

背景

对于具有高传播风险的 HIV 暴露婴儿,联合抗逆转录病毒药物方案越来越多地被用作新生儿接触后预防(PEP)。我们评估了在生命的头 6 周内使用齐多夫定(ZDV)/拉米夫定(3TC)/奈韦拉平(NVP)进行新生儿 PEP 相关的不良事件。

方法

在泰国的 5 个临床地点进行了一项非母乳喂养的 HIV 暴露婴儿的前瞻性队列研究。研究人群包括 100 例高风险 HIV 暴露婴儿(分娩前母亲 HIV RNA>50 拷贝/mL 或接受抗逆转录病毒治疗<12 周)和 100 例低风险 HIV 暴露新生儿。高危婴儿接受 ZDV/3TC/NVP 治疗 6 周,而低危 HIV 暴露新生儿接受 ZDV 4 周治疗。在出生时、1 个月、2 个月和 4 个月时评估全血细胞计数、天冬氨酸转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶。

结果

从 2015 年 10 月至 2017 年 11 月,共纳入 200 例婴儿,其中 18.5%的婴儿出生体重<2500g。在 ZDV/3TC/NVP 和 ZDV 预防组中,1 个月和 2 个月时发生 2 级或更高级别贫血的婴儿比例分别为 48.5%和 32.3%(P=0.02);然而,严重贫血(3 级)并无显著差异,分别为 9.2%和 10.2%(P=0.81)。在 1 个月大时,接受 ZDV/3TC/NVP 预防的婴儿与单独接受 ZDV 的婴儿相比,2 级贫血发生率显著升高(33.0%比 13.4%;P=0.001);然而,在 2 个月时没有差异。两种婴儿预防方案之间的中性粒细胞减少症或肝毒性无差异。

结论

在高风险 HIV 暴露婴儿中,使用 ZDV/3TC/NVP 进行 6 周的三联抗逆转录病毒新生儿 PEP 与 ZDV 单药预防相比,并未显著增加短期毒性风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验