Suppr超能文献

《坦普勒死亡焦虑量表结构效度的跨文化评估:一项系统综述》

A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Construct Validity of Templer's Death Anxiety Scale: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sharif Nia Hamid, Lehto Rebecca H, Pahlevan Sharif Saeed, Mashrouteh Mahdieh, Goudarzian Amir Hossein, Rahmatpour Pardis, Torkmandi Hojjat, Yaghoobzadeh Ameneh

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery Amol, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI, USA.

出版信息

Omega (Westport). 2021 Sep;83(4):760-776. doi: 10.1177/0030222819865407. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

Abstract

Ensuring use of valid and reliable scales for evaluating death anxiety that are relevant to the cultural context where they are applied is essential. The purpose of the study was to conduct a systematic review of the psychometric properties of Templer's Death Anxiety Scale (DAS) across cultures. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, SID, and Magiran databases were systematically searched for studies published between 1970 and 2017 using Mesh terms. Two independent researchers used and to evaluate study quality. Included studies were conducted in Iran, United States, Italy, China, Egypt, Spain, and Australia. Overall study quality was acceptable in 15 evaluated articles. However, findings demonstrated that two (one study), three (seven studies), four (four studies), and five factors (three studies) were extracted across the respective studies. Confirmatory concurrent validity was assessed in two studies. While Templer's DAS has stood the test of time as a commonly used index of capturing the conscious experience of death anxiety, there are psychometric inconsistencies in identified factor solutions across cultures. Findings emphasize the need for continued evaluation of how the DAS is translated in specific countries with assessment in relation to other death construct tools.

摘要

确保使用有效且可靠的量表来评估与应用文化背景相关的死亡焦虑至关重要。本研究的目的是对跨文化背景下坦普勒死亡焦虑量表(DAS)的心理测量特性进行系统综述。使用医学主题词(Mesh)在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Knowledge、SID和Magiran数据库中系统检索1970年至2017年间发表的研究。两名独立研究人员使用[具体方法1]和[具体方法2]评估研究质量。纳入的研究在伊朗、美国、意大利、中国、埃及、西班牙和澳大利亚进行。在15篇评估文章中,总体研究质量是可接受的。然而,研究结果表明,在各自的研究中分别提取出了两个因素(一项研究)、三个因素(七项研究)、四个因素(四项研究)和五个因素(三项研究)。两项研究评估了验证性同时效度。虽然坦普勒的DAS作为捕捉死亡焦虑意识体验的常用指标经受住了时间的考验,但在不同文化中确定的因素解决方案存在心理测量学上的不一致。研究结果强调需要持续评估DAS在特定国家的翻译方式,并与其他死亡构念工具进行相关评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验