Bilsborough A, Wood B A
Department of Anthropology, University of Durham, England.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1988 May;76(1):61-86. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330760107.
We report here on early hominid facial diversity, as part of a more extensive morphometric survey of cranial variability in Pliocene and early Pleistocene Hominidae. Univariate and multivariate techniques are used to summarise variation in facial proportions in South and East African hominids, and later Quaternary groups are included as comparators in order to scale the variation displayed. The results indicate that "robust" australopithecines have longer, broader faces than the "gracile" form, but that all australopithecine species show comparable degrees of facial projection. "Robust" crania are characterised by anteriorly situated, deep malar processes that slope forwards and downwards. Smaller hominid specimens, formally or informally assigned to Homo (H. habilis, KNM-ER 1813, etc.), have individual facial dimensions that usually fall within the range of Australopithecus africanus, but which in combination reveal a significantly different morphological pattern; SK 847 shows similarly hominine facial proportions, which differ significantly from those of A. robustus specimens from Swartkrans. KNM-ER 1470 possesses a facial pattern that is basically hominine, but which in some respects mimics that of "robust" australopithecines. Early specimens referred to H. erectus possess facial proportions that contrast markedly with those of other Villafranchian hominids and which suggest differing masticatory forces, possibly reflecting a shift in dietary niche. Overall the results indicate two broad patterns of facial proportions in Hominidae: one is characteristic of Pliocene/basal Pleistocene forms with opposite polarities represented by A. boisei and H. habilis; the other pattern, which typifies hominids from the later Lower Pleistocene onwards, is first found in specimens widely regarded as early representatives of H. erectus, but which differ in which certain respects from the face of later members of that species.
我们在此报告早期原始人类面部的多样性,这是对上新世和更新世早期人科动物颅骨变异性进行更广泛形态测量调查的一部分。单变量和多变量技术用于总结南非和东非原始人类面部比例的变化,并将晚更新世群体作为比较对象纳入,以便衡量所显示的变异性。结果表明,“粗壮型”南方古猿的面部比“纤细型”更长、更宽,但所有南方古猿物种的面部突出程度相当。“粗壮型”颅骨的特征是颧骨突起位于前方且较深,向前下方倾斜。一些被正式或非正式归类为 Homo(能人,KNM - ER 1813 等)的较小原始人类标本,其个体面部尺寸通常落在非洲南方古猿的范围内,但综合起来却呈现出明显不同的形态模式;SK 847 显示出类似人类的面部比例,与斯瓦特克朗斯的粗壮南方古猿标本有显著差异。KNM - ER 1470 具有基本类似人类的面部模式,但在某些方面模仿了“粗壮型”南方古猿。早期被归为直立人的标本具有与其他维拉方期原始人类明显不同的面部比例,这表明咀嚼力不同,可能反映了饮食生态位的转变。总体而言,结果表明人科动物面部比例有两种大致模式:一种是上新世/早更新世早期形式的特征,以鲍氏南方古猿和能人代表相反的极端情况;另一种模式代表从更新世早期晚期开始的原始人类,首次发现于被广泛认为是直立人早期代表的标本中,但在某些方面与该物种后期成员的面部有所不同。