• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项用于在急诊部门进行心理健康分诊的专家德尔菲研究。

An Expert Delphi study to derive a tool for mental health triage in emergency departments.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2020 Dec;37(12):738-743. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208388. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2018-208388
PMID:31366624
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate and collate the opinions of experts regarding the triage of patients in mental health crisis presenting to EDs.

DESIGN

A three-round e-Delphi study was conducted between November 2017 and April 2018. The panel of 28 representative experts were drawn from six stakeholder groups. 23 of the panel were clinicians working in England, while 5 were international triage experts.

RESULTS

Experts generated 173 statements in six topic areas in the first round. 32 of these statements reached consensus in round 2. A further 20 statements reached consensus in round 3, leaving 121 statements that did not reach consensus. The consensus statements were used to develop a structured five-level triage tool where the highest level of priority was assigned to patients exhibiting extreme aggression or agitation, those requiring restraint, those at immediate risk of leaving before assessment and those who presented a high risk of self-harm or harm to others. At lower triage priorities, other factors, such as items of psychiatric history, collateral history, observations and judgements, have been identified.

CONCLUSIONS

A broadly based, multispecialty, multiprofessional expert Delphi panel has reached consensus on 52 statements concerning the triage of patients presenting in mental health crisis to EDs. The triage tool derived from this work can be used to inform the design of triage instruments employed to prioritise patients with physical and mental health problems equitably.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查和整理专家对急诊精神危机患者分诊的意见。

设计

2017 年 11 月至 2018 年 4 月期间进行了三轮电子德尔菲研究。该小组由来自六个利益相关者群体的 28 名代表性专家组成。小组中的 23 名专家是在英格兰工作的临床医生,5 名是国际分诊专家。

结果

专家们在第一轮的六个主题领域提出了 173 条意见。其中 32 条意见在第二轮达成共识。在第三轮又有 20 条意见达成共识,剩下 121 条意见未达成共识。共识意见被用来制定一个结构化的五级分诊工具,其中最高优先级分配给表现出极度攻击或激动、需要约束、有立即在评估前离开风险和有高自残或伤害他人风险的患者。在较低的分诊优先级下,还确定了其他因素,如精神病史、旁证病史、观察和判断。

结论

一个基础广泛、多专业、多专业的专家德尔菲小组就急诊精神危机患者分诊的 52 条意见达成了共识。由此产生的分诊工具可用于为有身体和心理健康问题的患者设计公平优先排序的分诊工具。

相似文献

1
An Expert Delphi study to derive a tool for mental health triage in emergency departments.一项用于在急诊部门进行心理健康分诊的专家德尔菲研究。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Dec;37(12):738-743. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208388. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
An international expert Delphi study to determine research needs in major incident management.国际专家德尔菲研究确定重大事件管理研究需求。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Aug;27(4):351-8. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12000982. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
3
Delphi based consensus study into planning for chemical incidents.基于德尔菲法的化学事故应急规划共识研究
Emerg Med J. 2004 Jan;21(1):24-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.003087.
4
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
5
Criteria for Critical Care Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance.危重症婴幼儿标准:PICU 收治、出院和分诊实施声明和分级护理指南。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):847-887. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001963.
6
Identifying research priorities for patient safety in mental health: an international expert Delphi study.确定精神卫生领域患者安全的研究重点:一项国际专家德尔菲研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 3;8(3):e021361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021361.
7
Evaluating the construct of triage acuity against a set of reference vignettes developed via modified Delphi method.根据通过改良德尔菲法开发的一组参考病例 vignettes 评估分诊 acuity 的结构。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jul;31(7):562-566. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202352. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
8
Spanish experts consensus on emergency psychiatric care in hospital emergency departments.西班牙专家关于医院急诊科紧急精神科护理的共识。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 4;24(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05939-1.
9
Practical application of the Delphi technique in a bicultural mental health nursing study in New Zealand.德尔菲技术在新西兰一项双文化心理健康护理研究中的实际应用。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Apr;46(1):95-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02969.x.
10
Development of mental health first-aid guidelines for suicide risk: a Delphi expert consensus study in Argentina and Chile.制定精神卫生急救自杀风险指南:阿根廷和智利的德尔菲专家共识研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):928. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05417-0.