Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 30;9(7):e028576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028576.
Worldwide, there are at least 230 million invasive procedures performed annually and most of us will undergo several in our lifetime. There is therefore a need for high-quality evidence to underpin this clinical area. Currently, however, there is no widely accepted definition of an invasive procedure and the terms 'surgery' and 'interventional procedure' are characterised inconsistently. We propose a definition for invasive procedures which addresses the limitations of those currently available. Our definition was developed from an analysis of the 3946 papers from the last decade. A preliminary definition was created based on existing definitions and applied to a variety of papers reporting all types of procedures. This definition was continuously updated and applied iteratively to all articles. The definition has three key components: (1) method of access to the body, (2) instrumentation and (3) requirement for operator skill. It therefore encapsulates all types of invasive procedure regardless of the method of access to the body (incision, natural orifice or percutaneous access), and is relevant whatever the clinical discipline (eg, obstetric, cardiac, dental, interventional cardiology or radiology). Crucially, the definition excludes medicinal products, except where their administration occurs within an invasive procedure (and thereby involves operator skill). The application of a universal definition of an invasive procedure will (1) inform the selection of relevant methods for study design, (2) streamline evidence synthesis and (3) improve research tracking, helping to identify evidence gaps and direct research funds.
在全球范围内,每年至少有 2.3 亿例侵袭性操作,我们大多数人在一生中都会经历几次。因此,需要高质量的证据来支持这一临床领域。然而,目前还没有广泛接受的侵袭性操作定义,而且“手术”和“介入性操作”这两个术语的使用不一致。我们提出了一个侵袭性操作的定义,以解决目前存在的局限性。我们的定义是基于对过去十年的 3946 篇论文的分析而制定的。最初的定义是基于现有的定义,并应用于各种报告各种类型操作的论文。该定义不断更新,并迭代应用于所有文章。该定义有三个关键组成部分:(1)进入人体的方法,(2)仪器和(3)操作人员技能的要求。因此,它包含了所有类型的侵袭性操作,无论进入人体的方法(切口、自然孔道或经皮进入)如何,也无论临床学科如何(例如,产科、心脏科、牙科、介入心脏病学或放射学)。至关重要的是,该定义排除了药物,除非它们的给药发生在侵袭性操作过程中(因此涉及操作人员技能)。侵袭性操作的通用定义的应用将(1)告知研究设计中相关方法的选择,(2)简化证据综合,(3)改进研究跟踪,有助于识别证据差距并指导研究资金。