• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定初级保健中乳糜泻病例筛查是否优于随机检测:一项回顾性研究。

Determining whether coeliac disease case-finding in primary care is better than random testing: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Chandler Kim, Robins Gerry

机构信息

Associate Specialist, Department of Gastroenterology, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.

Consultant Gastroenterologist, Department of Gastroenterology, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK

出版信息

BJGP Open. 2019 Jul 23;3(2). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101648. Print 2019 Jul.

DOI:10.3399/bjgpopen19X101648
PMID:31366679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6662879/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over 75% of patients (approximately half a million) with coeliac disease in the UK have not been formally diagnosed.

AIM

To determine if case-finding of coeliac disease is better than random testing in primary care.

DESIGN & SETTING: A pragmatic study looked at all referrals across a 12-month period (December 2013-November 2014) for coeliac serology testing and the indications for testing across 38 GP practices in a well-defined geographical area in North Yorkshire. There was further follow-up for an additional 12 months to determine conversion of positive serology to duodenal biopsy.

METHOD

All serology samples sent into York Hospital biochemistry department during the study period were analysed for the indication for testing. Positive results were cross-referenced for duodenal biopsies over the following 12 months on the York Hospital pathology database.

RESULTS

Case-finding of coeliac patients in primary care is no better than random testing of the population. Only 71% of patients with positive serology went on to have a duodenal biopsy in the following 12 months.

CONCLUSION

More education of the population and of primary care physicians is needed around the indications for checking for coeliac disease. It may be that primary care is not the best place to case-find patients with coeliac disease.

摘要

背景

在英国,超过75%的乳糜泻患者(约50万)尚未得到正式诊断。

目的

确定在初级保健中,乳糜泻病例发现是否优于随机检测。

设计与设置

一项实用性研究观察了在12个月期间(2013年12月至2014年11月),北约克郡一个明确地理区域内38家全科医生诊所转诊进行乳糜泻血清学检测的所有病例以及检测指征。进一步随访12个月,以确定血清学阳性转为十二指肠活检的情况。

方法

对研究期间送至约克医院生化科的所有血清学样本进行检测指征分析。在接下来的12个月里,在约克医院病理数据库中对阳性结果与十二指肠活检进行交叉对照。

结果

初级保健中乳糜泻患者的病例发现并不优于对人群的随机检测。在接下来的12个月里,只有71%血清学阳性的患者进行了十二指肠活检。

结论

需要对公众和初级保健医生进行更多关于乳糜泻检查指征的教育。可能初级保健并非发现乳糜泻患者的最佳场所。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056a/6662879/e552c4a4946b/bjgpopen-3-1648-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056a/6662879/9594f32e5921/bjgpopen-3-1648-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056a/6662879/e552c4a4946b/bjgpopen-3-1648-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056a/6662879/9594f32e5921/bjgpopen-3-1648-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056a/6662879/e552c4a4946b/bjgpopen-3-1648-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Determining whether coeliac disease case-finding in primary care is better than random testing: a retrospective study.确定初级保健中乳糜泻病例筛查是否优于随机检测:一项回顾性研究。
BJGP Open. 2019 Jul 23;3(2). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101648. Print 2019 Jul.
2
Increasing numbers at a specialist coeliac clinic: contribution of serological testing in primary care.一家专科乳糜泻诊所就诊人数的增加:初级保健中血清学检测的作用。
Dig Liver Dis. 2005 Dec;37(12):928-33. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.07.011. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
3
'Pre-endoscopy point of care test (Simtomax- IgA/IgG-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide) for coeliac disease in iron deficiency anaemia: diagnostic accuracy and a cost saving economic model'.缺铁性贫血中乳糜泻的内镜检查前即时检验(Simtomax-IgA/IgG-去酰胺麦醇溶蛋白肽):诊断准确性及成本节约型经济模型
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep 15;16:115. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0521-5.
4
Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost-efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre-endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway.随机十二指肠活检以排除乳糜泻作为贫血的病因在成本效益上是不可行的,应该在疑似癌症患者的内镜检查前,用普遍进行的血清学检查来替代。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Feb;22(2):121-124. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1756-7. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
5
High rates of serology testing for coeliac disease, and low rates of endoscopy in serologically positive children and adults in Israel: lessons from a large real-world database.以色列乳糜泻血清学检测率高,而血清学阳性儿童和成人的内镜检查率低:来自大型真实世界数据库的经验教训。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;32(3):329-334. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001613.
6
Use of the anti-endomysial antibody test to diagnose coeliac disease in clinical practice.在临床实践中使用抗肌内膜抗体检测来诊断乳糜泻。
Clin Lab. 2002;48(5-6):319-25.
7
Is a raised intraepithelial lymphocyte count with normal duodenal villous architecture clinically relevant?十二指肠绒毛结构正常但上皮内淋巴细胞计数升高在临床上有意义吗?
J Clin Pathol. 2002 Jun;55(6):424-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.55.6.424.
8
Natural history and clinical detection of undiagnosed coeliac disease in a North American community.在一个北美的社区中,对未确诊的乳糜泻的自然病史和临床检测。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;47(10):1358-1366. doi: 10.1111/apt.14625. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
9
Coeliac disease screening is suboptimal in a tertiary gastroenterology setting.在三级胃肠病学环境中,乳糜泻筛查并不理想。
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Aug;93(1102):472-475. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134005. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
10
Routine duodenal biopsy to screen for coeliac disease is not effective.通过常规十二指肠活检筛查乳糜泻并不有效。
Neth J Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;71(6):308-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Celiac Disease on the Bed-Side: Embedding Case Finding and Screening in Hospitalized Children.床旁乳糜泻:在住院儿童中开展病例发现和筛查。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 23;15(23):4899. doi: 10.3390/nu15234899.

本文引用的文献

1
Case-finding in primary care for coeliac disease: Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a rapid point-of-care test.基层医疗中乳糜泻的病例发现:即时快速检测的准确性和成本效益
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Jul;6(6):855-865. doi: 10.1177/2050640618761700. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
2
Diagnostic Yield of 2 Strategies for Adult Celiac Disease Identification in Primary Care.成人原发性肠病诊断中两种策略对乳糜泻的诊断效果。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;53(1):15-22. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000962.
3
Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: All wheat attack is not celiac.
非乳糜泻麸质敏感:并非所有的小麦攻击都是乳糜泻。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct 28;23(40):7201-7210. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i40.7201.
4
Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology.成人乳糜泻的诊断和管理:英国胃肠病学会指南。
Gut. 2014 Aug;63(8):1210-28. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306578. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
5
Incidence and prevalence of celiac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis in the UK over two decades: population-based study.英国二十多年来乳糜泻和疱疹样皮炎的发病率及患病率:基于人群的研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 May;109(5):757-68. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.55. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
6
Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: literature review.非乳糜泻麸质敏感:文献综述
J Am Coll Nutr. 2014;33(1):39-54. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2014.869996.
7
The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms.奥胡斯定义:乳糜泻及相关术语
Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):43-52. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301346. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
8
European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease.欧洲儿科胃肠病学、肝病学和营养学学会关于乳糜泻诊断的指南。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Jan;54(1):136-60. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31821a23d0.
9
Recent advances in coeliac disease.乳糜泻的最新进展
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;25(2):100-9. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32831ef20d.
10
A case-control study of presentations in general practice before diagnosis of coeliac disease.一项关于乳糜泻诊断前全科医疗中临床表现的病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Aug;57(541):636-42.