Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
mSphere. 2019 Jul 31;4(4):e00271-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00271-19.
The gut microbiome of primates, including humans, is reported to closely follow host evolutionary history, with gut microbiome composition being specific to the genetic background of its primate host. However, the comparative models used to date have mainly included a limited set of closely related primates. To further understand the forces that shape the primate gut microbiome, with reference to human populations, we expanded the comparative analysis of variation among gut microbiome compositions and their primate hosts, including 9 different primate species and 4 human groups characterized by a diverse set of subsistence patterns ( = 448 samples). The results show that the taxonomic composition of the human gut microbiome, at the genus level, exhibits increased compositional plasticity. Specifically, we show unexpected similarities between African Old World monkeys that rely on eclectic foraging and human populations engaging in nonindustrial subsistence patterns; these similarities transcend host phylogenetic constraints. Thus, instead of following evolutionary trends that would make their microbiomes more similar to that of conspecifics or more phylogenetically similar apes, gut microbiome composition in humans from nonindustrial populations resembles that of generalist cercopithecine monkeys. We also document that wild cercopithecine monkeys with eclectic diets and humans following nonindustrial subsistence patterns harbor high gut microbiome diversity that is not only higher than that seen in humans engaging in industrialized lifestyles but also higher compared to wild primates that typically consume fiber-rich diets. The results of this study indicate a discordance between gut microbiome composition and evolutionary history in primates, calling into question previous notions about host genetic control of the primate gut microbiome. Microbiome similarities between humans consuming nonindustrialized diets and monkeys characterized by subsisting on eclectic, omnivorous diets also raise questions about the ecological and nutritional drivers shaping the human gut microbiome. Moreover, a more detailed understanding of the factors associated with gut microbiome plasticity in primates offers a framework to understand why humans following industrialized lifestyles have deviated from states thought to reflect human evolutionary history. The results also provide perspectives for developing therapeutic dietary manipulations that can reset configurations of the gut microbiome to potentially improve human health.
灵长类动物(包括人类)的肠道微生物组被报道与宿主的进化史密切相关,其肠道微生物组的组成与灵长类宿主的遗传背景特异性相关。然而,迄今为止使用的比较模型主要包括一组有限的密切相关的灵长类动物。为了进一步了解塑造灵长类肠道微生物组的力量,我们参考了人类群体,扩大了对肠道微生物组组成及其灵长类宿主之间变异的比较分析,包括 9 种不同的灵长类物种和 4 个人群,这些人群的生存方式各不相同(=448 个样本)。结果表明,人类肠道微生物组的分类组成在属水平上表现出增加的组成可塑性。具体来说,我们在依赖杂食性觅食的非洲旧世界猴和从事非工业化生存方式的人类群体之间发现了出乎意料的相似之处;这些相似之处超越了宿主系统发育的限制。因此,人类肠道微生物组的组成并没有遵循使它们的微生物组与同物种或更系统发育上相似的类人猿更相似的进化趋势,而是类似于从事非工业化生存方式的人类肠道微生物组。我们还记录到,饮食杂食的野生狨猴和从事非工业化生存方式的人类拥有高度多样化的肠道微生物组,不仅高于从事工业化生活方式的人类,而且高于通常以富含纤维的饮食为食的野生灵长类动物。这项研究的结果表明,灵长类动物的肠道微生物组组成与进化历史之间存在不一致,这对以前关于宿主遗传控制灵长类肠道微生物组的观点提出了质疑。食用非工业化饮食的人类和以杂食、杂食为生的猴子之间的微生物组相似性也引发了关于塑造人类肠道微生物组的生态和营养驱动因素的问题。此外,对灵长类动物肠道微生物组可塑性相关因素的更详细了解为理解为什么遵循工业化生活方式的人类偏离了被认为反映人类进化历史的状态提供了一个框架。研究结果还为开发治疗性饮食干预措施提供了视角,这些措施可以重置肠道微生物组的配置,从而有可能改善人类健康。