• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接冠修复体的失败原因及使用寿命:对科特迪瓦阿比让市牙科医生的一项调查

The causes of failure and the longevity of direct coronal restorations: A survey among dental surgeons of the town of Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.

作者信息

Avoaka-Boni Marie-Chantal, Djolé Stéphane X, Désiré Kaboré Wendpoulomdé Aimé, D Gnagne-Koffi Yolande N, E Koffi Alexandra F

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, University Felix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.

Research Center of Health Sciences (UFR/SDS), University Ouaga I Professor Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, West Africa, Burkina Faso.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2019 May-Jun;22(3):270-274. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_541_18.

DOI:10.4103/JCD.JCD_541_18
PMID:31367112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6632625/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to itemize the causes for the failure of direct coronal restorations (DCRs) according to the practitioners of Côte d'Ivoire in order to provide recommendations for good practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A descriptive, self-reporting, prospective survey was carried out among 109 dental surgeons (DSs) in the town of Abidjan based on 587 randomly selected practitioners supplied by the National Board of the Order.

RESULTS

The results show that 98.10% of the surveyed DSs had previously encountered cases of failure. Fracturing of the restoration, which is the basis for the hiatus, is the main cause of failure according to 51.40% of the surveyed practitioners, followed by pain "under the restoration" cited by 26.20% of them. Failure occurs within 6 months (30.85% of those surveyed), after 5 years (9.6% of those surveyed) for restorations with composite or glass ionomer cement (GIC), while for DCRs with amalgam, failure occurs within 6 months (28.70%), after 5 years (16%) and beyond 10 years (3.20%).

CONCLUSION

The practitioners often encountered failures of DCRs, with fracture of the restoration as the cause. Dental amalgam appears to have a greater longevity than adhesive restorations. Faced with a failure, they more often opted for a replacement of the DCRs rather than a repair.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据科特迪瓦的从业者列出直接冠修复(DCR)失败的原因,以便为良好实践提供建议。

材料与方法

基于国家秩序委员会提供的587名随机选择的从业者,对阿比让市的109名牙科外科医生(DS)进行了一项描述性、自我报告的前瞻性调查。

结果

结果显示,98.10%的受访DS此前曾遇到失败病例。修复体断裂是裂隙形成的基础,51.40%的受访从业者认为这是失败的主要原因,其次是26.20%的人提到的“修复体下疼痛”。对于复合树脂或玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)修复体,失败发生在6个月内(30.85%的受访者)、5年后(9.6%的受访者);而对于汞合金直接冠修复,失败发生在6个月内(28.70%)、5年后(16%)和10年以上(3.20%)。

结论

从业者经常遇到直接冠修复失败的情况,修复体断裂是原因。牙科汞合金似乎比粘结修复体具有更长的使用寿命。面对失败,他们更常选择更换直接冠修复体而不是进行修复。

相似文献

1
The causes of failure and the longevity of direct coronal restorations: A survey among dental surgeons of the town of Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.直接冠修复体的失败原因及使用寿命:对科特迪瓦阿比让市牙科医生的一项调查
J Conserv Dent. 2019 May-Jun;22(3):270-274. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_541_18.
2
[Evaluation of crown-root restorations in non-vital teeth. Survey of dentists in the city of Abidjan].[非活髓牙冠根修复体的评估。阿比让市牙医调查]
Odontostomatol Trop. 2011 Jun;34(134):11-5.
3
Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.英国职业牙医及其培训师所提供修复体的使用寿命恢复情况以及修复体放置和更换原因分析
Quintessence Int. 1999 Apr;30(4):234-42.
4
Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.银汞合金替代物中大面积直接复合树脂修复体的临床寿命:长达3.5年的随访
J Dent. 2014 Nov;42(11):1404-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
5
A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.《全国牙科实践为基础的研究网络:对汞合金和树脂基复合材料修复体的 24 个月评估》研究结果。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jun;144(6):583-93. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169.
6
Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.关于乳牙传统玻璃离子体和汞合金修复体的八年研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Feb;62(1):37-45. doi: 10.1080/00016350310008689.
7
Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.直接后牙修复的临床结果与新进展
Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):41D-54D.
8
Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.直接后牙修复体的修复可提高存活率——基于实践的研究。
J Dent. 2017 Sep;64:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
9
Defective restoration repair or replacement: An American Dental Association Clinical Evaluators Panel survey.修复、重建或替换的缺陷:美国牙科学会临床评估小组调查。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Apr;152(4):329-330.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.01.011.
10
A retrospective cross-sectional study of early patient-reported failures of direct restorations placed in a primary dental care setting.在初级牙科保健环境中放置的直接修复体早期患者报告失败的回顾性横断面研究。
Br Dent J. 2021 Jul;231(1):43-48. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3166-x. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Susceptibility of Dental Caries Microcosm Biofilms to Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Fotoenticine.龋病微观生物膜对Fotoenticine介导的光动力疗法的敏感性
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Nov 10;13(11):1907. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111907.
2
Antimicrobial activity and toxicity of glass ionomer cement containing an essential oil.含精油的玻璃离子水门汀的抗菌活性和毒性。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2020 Oct 30;53(12):e9468. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20209468. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of Image Filters and Variation in Horizontal Angle of Incidence of X-ray Beam in Digital Interproximal Radiographs for Diagnosis of Secondary Caries in Esthetic Restorations.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Oct 1;16(10):805-12. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1761.
2
Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙修复体中汞合金和树脂复合材料的使用寿命:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2015 Sep;43(9):1043-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
3
Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults – A systematic review.成人后牙树脂复合材料修复体的使用寿命——一项系统评价。
J Dent. 2015 Aug;43(8):934-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 21.
4
Risk factors for secondary caries in direct composite restorations in primary teeth.乳牙直接复合树脂修复继发龋的危险因素。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Nov;25(6):451-61. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12157. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
5
Factors influencing repair of dental restorations with resin composite.影响树脂复合材料修复牙齿的因素。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014 Oct 17;6:81-7. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S53461. eCollection 2014.
6
Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙复合树脂修复体的使用寿命:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):943-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034514544217. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
7
Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.恒牙或成人后牙的直接复合树脂补牙与汞合金补牙对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 31(3):CD005620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005620.pub2.
8
Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges.口腔细菌和唾液对树脂复合材料及黏合剂的生物降解作用:针对考虑临床环境和治疗挑战的新型材料设计的基本原理。
Dent Mater. 2014 Jan;30(1):16-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.201. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
9
Cariogenic bacteria degrade dental resin composites and adhesives.致龋菌会降解牙用树脂复合材料和牙用粘接剂。
J Dent Res. 2013 Nov;92(11):989-94. doi: 10.1177/0022034513504436. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
10
Degradation in the dentin-composite interface subjected to multi-species biofilm challenges.多物种生物膜挑战下牙本质-复合树脂界面的降解。
Acta Biomater. 2014 Jan;10(1):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.034. Epub 2013 Sep 3.