Horne Jane C, Hooban Kate E, Lincoln Nadina B, Logan Pip A
University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, B floor-Rm98, QMC Campus, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Jul 25;5:96. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0480-z. eCollection 2019.
The Regaining Confidence after Stroke (RCAS) course was designed to facilitate adjustment for people with stroke discharged from rehabilitation. The aim of the trial was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomised trial to compare a RCAS course with usual care. The rates feasibility of screening and recruitment, rates of consent and retention, acceptability of outcome measures and the acceptability and fidelity of the intervention were evaluated.
Participants with stroke were recruited from hospital databases and community services and randomly assigned to the Regaining Confidence after Stroke (RCAS) course or usual care. The course comprised 11 weekly 2-h sessions with six-eight participants, delivered by two rehabilitation assistants. Carers were invited to attend three of the sessions. Sessions were video recorded. A six-item checklist was developed from the manual content. Each item was rated as met, partially met or not met. Fidelity was assumed if > 75% of the criteria were met. Outcomes were assessed three and six months after randomisation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using open-ended questions to assess the acceptability of the intervention.
Of 47 participants (mean age 66.9 years [SD 14.9]; 26 men), 22 were randomly allocated to the intervention and 25 to usual care. Participants attended a mean of 8.2 [SD 2.6] out of 11 sessions. Fidelity outcomes suggested that the content corresponded to the manual but further training of the therapist was needed. Interview findings indicated the intervention was acceptable and considered beneficial. At three months, 35 (78%) participants returned questionnaires and 30 (67%) at six months, but only 38(42%) were fully completed.
The results support the feasibility of conducting a randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a RCAS course compared to usual care.
ISRCTN 36330958.
中风后重拾信心(RCAS)课程旨在帮助从中风康复机构出院的患者进行调整。该试验的目的是评估进行一项随机试验以比较RCAS课程与常规护理的可行性。评估了筛查和招募的可行性、同意参与和保留率、结局指标的可接受性以及干预措施的可接受性和保真度。
从医院数据库和社区服务机构招募中风患者,并将其随机分配至中风后重拾信心(RCAS)课程组或常规护理组。该课程包括11次每周2小时的课程,每次课程有6至8名参与者,由两名康复助理授课。邀请护理人员参加其中3次课程。课程进行视频录制。根据手册内容制定了一份六项清单。每个项目被评为符合、部分符合或不符合。如果超过75%的标准得到满足,则认为保真度达标。在随机分组后3个月和6个月评估结局。使用开放式问题进行半结构化访谈,以评估干预措施的可接受性。
47名参与者(平均年龄66.9岁[标准差14.9];26名男性)中,22名被随机分配至干预组,25名被分配至常规护理组。参与者平均参加了11次课程中的8.2次[标准差2.6]。保真度结果表明,内容与手册相符,但需要对治疗师进行进一步培训。访谈结果表明,该干预措施是可接受的,并被认为是有益的。3个月时,35名(78%)参与者返回了问卷,6个月时为30名(67%),但只有38份(42%)问卷完整填写。
结果支持进行一项随机试验以评估RCAS课程与常规护理相比有效性的可行性。
ISRCTN 36330958。