Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Oct;43(5):1173-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01463-w. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
Pulse lavage (PL) irrigation of prosthesis pockets has prior been described for breast implant salvages. However, PL for removal of leaked silicone from prosthesis pockets after implant ruptures has not been studied yet. Since open capsulotomies are regarded as equal treatment of capsular contracture (CC) than capsulectomies, this study analyzed the clinical outcome of PL for silicone removal and subsequent capsulotomy in cases of concurrent CC and breast implant rupture.
Between 2012 and 2017, 55 patients (75 breasts) with suspected silicone implant rupture and CC (Baker grade III/IV), after primary breast augmentation or implant-based breast reconstruction, were included in a retrospective, observational study. Mean patient follow-up was 12.2 ± 3.6 months.
In all preoperatively suspected ruptured silicone breast implants, around a quarter were intact. In contrast to previously published data, implant exchanges in cases of implant ruptures did not lead to significantly higher CC recurrence rates (27.6% vs. 22.2% in cases of intact implants, p = 0.682), if the prosthesis pockets were treated with PL irrigation followed by open capsulotomy. PL reduced the amount of encapsulated silicone remnants histologically. The age of patients with CC after failed implant-based reconstruction was significant lower for salvage surgeries with flap reconstruction than for implant exchanges, p < 0.05.
PL irrigation of prosthesis pockets prior to open capsulotomy is a safe and effective treatment of CC with concurrent silicone leakage. Remaining silicone remnants in breast capsules may affect the development of a recurrent CC. To avoid CC recurrences, patients should consider conversion to autologous tissue.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
脉冲灌洗(PL)冲洗假体袋先前已被描述用于乳房植入物抢救。然而,PL 用于去除植入物破裂后假体袋中的泄漏硅胶尚未得到研究。由于开放式囊切开术被认为与囊切除术一样是包膜挛缩(CC)的治疗方法,因此本研究分析了 PL 用于去除硅胶和随后进行囊切开术治疗同时发生 CC 和乳房植入物破裂的临床结果。
在 2012 年至 2017 年间,55 例(75 只乳房)接受过原发性乳房增大或基于植入物的乳房重建的疑似硅胶植入物破裂和 CC(贝克 III/IV 级)的患者被纳入回顾性观察研究。平均患者随访时间为 12.2±3.6 个月。
在所有术前疑似破裂的硅胶乳房植入物中,约四分之一是完整的。与之前发表的数据不同,如果在开放式囊切开术前对假体袋进行 PL 冲洗,植入物破裂病例中的植入物更换并不会导致 CC 复发率显著升高(完整植入物的复发率为 27.6%,破裂植入物的复发率为 22.2%,p=0.682)。PL 减少了组织学上包裹的硅胶残留物的数量。对于失败的基于植入物的重建后发生 CC 的患者,接受皮瓣重建的挽救手术的年龄明显低于接受植入物更换的患者,p<0.05。
在开放式囊切开术前对假体袋进行 PL 冲洗是治疗同时发生硅胶泄漏和 CC 的安全有效的方法。乳房胶囊中残留的硅胶残留物可能会影响复发性 CC 的发展。为了避免 CC 复发,患者应考虑转换为自体组织。
证据水平 IV:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。