Suppr超能文献

同次就诊双向内镜检查的最佳序列:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Optimal sequences of same-visit bidirectional endoscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2020 Jul;32(5):706-714. doi: 10.1111/den.13503. Epub 2019 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Same-visit colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) have become common. Recent studies showed conflicting results regarding the performance, safety, and efficacy of different sequences. We conducted this meta-analysis to determine the most favorable performance and discomfort between an EGD followed by colonoscopy (E-C) and colonoscopy followed by EGD (C-E).

METHODS

The authors searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Outcomes of interest were performance (including cecal intubation time, adenoma detection rate, and polyp detection rate), discomfort score (patients and endoscopists; Likert scale), and sedation uses. Pooled mean differences (MD) or odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The authors found that there was significantly lower sedative use including fentanyl (14.70; 95% Cl: 8.20-21.20) and propofol (15.58; 95% Cl: 3.27-27.89) in the E-C group compared with the C-E group. There was a significantly better discomfort score in patients and endoscopists after both procedures in the E-C group than in the C-E group with pooled MD of 0.64 points (95% Cl: 0.09-1.20) and 0.47 (95% Cl: 0.05-0.90), respectively. There were no differences in cecal intubation time, adenoma detection rate, or polyp detection rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study found that the discomfort score was better in the E-C group. However, there was no difference in polyp and adenoma detection. Therefore, the E-C group is the optimal sequence.

摘要

背景与目的

同一次就诊行结肠镜和食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)已变得很常见。最近的研究表明,不同检查顺序的性能、安全性和疗效存在相互矛盾的结果。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以确定 EGD 后行结肠镜检查(E-C)与结肠镜检查后行 EGD(C-E)两种顺序中哪种更具优势。

方法

作者检索了 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库。感兴趣的结果是性能(包括盲肠插管时间、腺瘤检出率和息肉检出率)、不适评分(患者和内镜医生;Likert 量表)和镇静剂使用情况。使用 95%置信区间(CI)计算合并均数差(MD)或比值比(OR)。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了 6 项随机对照试验。作者发现,E-C 组中芬太尼(14.70;95%CI:8.20-21.20)和丙泊酚(15.58;95%CI:3.27-27.89)的镇静剂使用率明显低于 C-E 组。E-C 组患者和内镜医生在两种检查后均有更好的不适感评分,合并 MD 分别为 0.64 分(95%CI:0.09-1.20)和 0.47(95%CI:0.05-0.90)。两组间盲肠插管时间、腺瘤检出率或息肉检出率无差异。

结论

本研究发现 E-C 组的不适感评分更好。然而,在息肉和腺瘤检出方面无差异。因此,E-C 组是最佳的检查顺序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验