• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种镇静模型用于同一天无痛双向内镜检查的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;37(8):1603-1609. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15901. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.15901
PMID:35618650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9543240/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We investigated the most beneficial propofol sedation model for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy (BDE).

METHODS

Asymptomatic participants scheduled for same-day painless BDE examination from October 2020 to September 2021 were randomized to three groups: sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy (Group A); sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated colonoscopy (Group B); and sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by sedated insertion colonoscopy (Group C). Patient discomfort, colonoscopy performance, doses of propofol, cardiovascular stress, anesthesia resuscitation, and sedation-related adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 3200 participants were analyzed. Baseline demographics, patient discomfort, cecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate and sedation-related adverse events were similar in the three groups. Propofol dose was the lowest in Group A (137.65 ± 36.865 mg) compared with Group B (177.71 ± 40.112 mg, P < 0.05) and Group C (161.63 ± 31.789 mg, P < 0.05). Decline in vital signs was most obvious in Group B during the procedure (P < 0.05). Recovery time was the shortest in Group A (5.01 ± 1.404 min) compared with Group B (9.51 ± 2.870 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (5.83 ± 2.594 min, P < 0.05); discharge time was the shortest in Group A (3.53 ± 1.685 min) compared with Group B (11.29 ± 5.172 min, P < 0.05) and Group C (6.47 ± 2.338 min, P < 0.05). Adenomas per positive patient of Group A (2.29 ± 1.055) and Group C (2.28 ± 0.931) were more than that in Group B (2.11 ± 0.946, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by unsedated colonoscopy is the superior model for same-day painless BDE with the benefits of satisfactory patient comfort, reduced sedation dose, less cardiovascular stress, faster recovery, shorter discharge time and high colonoscopy quality.

摘要

背景与目的

我们研究了最有益于当日无痛性双向内镜检查(BDE)的异丙酚镇静模型。

方法

从 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 9 月,选择同日接受无痛性 BDE 检查的无症状参与者进行随机分组,分为三组:镇静胃镜检查后行非镇静结肠镜检查(A 组);镇静胃镜检查后行镇静结肠镜检查(B 组);镇静胃镜检查后行镇静插入结肠镜检查(C 组)。评估患者不适、结肠镜检查性能、异丙酚剂量、心血管应激、麻醉复苏和镇静相关不良事件。

结果

共分析了 3200 名参与者。三组患者的基线人口统计学特征、患者不适、盲肠插管率、腺瘤检出率和镇静相关不良事件相似。与 B 组(177.71±40.112mg,P<0.05)和 C 组(161.63±31.789mg,P<0.05)相比,A 组(137.65±36.865mg)的异丙酚剂量最低。在手术过程中,B 组的生命体征下降最为明显(P<0.05)。与 B 组(9.51±2.870min,P<0.05)和 C 组(5.83±2.594min,P<0.05)相比,A 组的恢复时间最短(5.01±1.404min)。与 B 组(11.29±5.172min,P<0.05)和 C 组(6.47±2.338min,P<0.05)相比,A 组的出院时间最短(3.53±1.685min)。A 组(2.29±1.055)和 C 组(2.28±0.931)每例阳性患者的腺瘤数多于 B 组(2.11±0.946,P<0.05)。

结论

镇静胃镜检查后行非镇静结肠镜检查是当日无痛性 BDE 的最佳模型,其优势在于患者舒适度满意、镇静剂量减少、心血管应激减轻、恢复更快、出院时间缩短和结肠镜检查质量高。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.三种镇静模型用于同一天无痛双向内镜检查的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;37(8):1603-1609. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15901. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Optimal procedural sequence for same-day bidirectional endoscopy with moderate sedation: A prospective randomized study.同一天内进行中度镇静下的双向内镜检查的最佳操作顺序:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;33(3):689-695. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13971.
3
Comparison of procedural sequences in same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: Single-center, prospective, randomized study.同日无痛双向内镜检查程序顺序的比较:单中心前瞻性随机研究
Dig Endosc. 2017 May;29(3):330-337. doi: 10.1111/den.12847. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Comparison of Procedural Sequences in Sedated Same-Day Bidirectional Endoscopy with Water-Exchange Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.镇静状态下当日双向内镜检查与水交换结肠镜检查的操作顺序比较:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 2;11(5):1365. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051365.
5
Same-day bidirectional endoscopy with nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol: safety and cost-effectiveness compared with separated exams.非麻醉医师管理下的同日双向内镜检查与分开检查的安全性和成本效益比较:使用异丙酚。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;26(3):301-8. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000026.
6
Propofol and non-propofol based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy-prospective comparison of depth of sedation using an EEG based SEDLine monitor.门诊结肠镜检查中丙泊酚与非丙泊酚镇静——使用基于脑电图的SEDLine监测仪对镇静深度进行前瞻性比较
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9769-5. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
7
Technical performance of colonoscopy in patients sedated with nurse-administered propofol.护士给予丙泊酚镇静的患者结肠镜检查的技术性能
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;99(1):52-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1572-0241.2003.04022.x.
8
The safety of combined sedation with propofol plus fentanyl for endoscopy screening and endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients.肝硬化患者行内镜筛查和内镜下食管静脉曲张结扎术时联合应用异丙酚加芬太尼镇静的安全性。
J Dig Dis. 2014 Mar;15(3):124-30. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12115.
9
Paired comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy with moderate sedation and carbon dioxide insufflation: A prospective observational study.同日双镜序贯检查中应用中度镇静和二氧化碳气腹的操作流程对比:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):360-365. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.191140.
10
A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation.在清醒镇静下进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查时,丙泊酚与右美托咪定用于镇静、血流动力学控制及满意度的比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Aug;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12282. Epub 2015 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Operation sequence of bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia affected colonoscopy performance: a randomized controlled trial.局部麻醉下双向内镜检查的操作顺序对结肠镜检查性能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03721-5.
2
Comparison of propofol-based sedation and midazolam sedation in pediatric bidirectional endoscopy conducted by pediatric gastroenterologists.儿科胃肠病学家进行的小儿双向内镜检查中丙泊酚镇静与咪达唑仑镇静的比较。
DEN Open. 2024 Jun 14;5(1):e391. doi: 10.1002/deo2.391. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Comparison of remimazolam and propofol combined with low dose esketamine for pediatric same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Hypotension during propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a retrospective exploratory analysis and meta-analysis.结肠镜检查中异丙酚镇静期间的低血压:回顾性探索性分析和荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;128(4):610-622. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.044. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
2
Cognitive status of patients judged fit for discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit after general anaesthesia: a randomized comparison between desflurane and propofol.全麻后适合从麻醉后恢复室出院的患者的认知状态:地氟醚与丙泊酚的随机比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01287-9.
3
National survey on sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in 2758 Chinese hospitals.
瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚联合低剂量艾司氯胺酮用于小儿日间无痛双向内镜检查的比较:一项随机对照临床试验
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Feb 5;15:1298409. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1298409. eCollection 2024.
2758 家中国医院胃肠内镜镇静状况的全国性调查。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;127(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
4
Sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review of recommendations.常规胃肠内镜检查的镇静实践:推荐意见的系统评价
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01561-z.
5
Estimation of effective dose of propofol mono-sedation for successful insertion of upper gastrointestinal endoscope in healthy, non-obese Chinese adults.健康非肥胖中国成年人行上消化道内镜检查时异丙酚单药镇静有效剂量的评估。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Apr;46(2):484-491. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13312. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
6
Guidelines for sedation in gastroenterological endoscopy (second edition).消化内镜镇静指南(第二版)。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):21-53. doi: 10.1111/den.13882. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
7
Deep sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study.使用丙泊酚靶控输注进行胃肠内镜检查的深度镇静:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 10;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01103-w.
8
Unsedated Colonoscopy: Impact on Quality Indicators.非镇静结肠镜检查:对质量指标的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Nov;65(11):3116-3122. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06491-0. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
9
The impact of sedation on quality metrics of colonoscopy: a single-center experience of 48,838 procedures.镇静对结肠镜检查质量指标的影响:单中心 48838 例操作的经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1155-1161. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03586-y. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
10
Impacts of age and sedation on cardiocerebrovascular adverse events after diagnostic GI endoscopy: a nationwide population-based study.年龄和镇静对诊断性胃肠内镜后心脑血管不良事件的影响:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):591-602.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3864. Epub 2020 Apr 12.