Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Center for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Aug 1;13(8):e0007446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007446. eCollection 2019 Aug.
Because the success of deworming programs targeting soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) is evaluated through the periodically assessment of prevalence and infection intensities, the use of the correct diagnostic method is of utmost importance. The STH community has recently published for each phase of a deworming program the minimal criteria that a potential diagnostic method needs to meet, the so-called target product profiles (TPPs).
We compared the diagnostic performance of a single Kato-Katz (reference method) with that of other microscopy-based methods (duplicate Kato-Katz, Mini-FLOTAC and FECPAKG2) and one DNA-based method (qPCR) for the detection and quantification of STH infections in three drug efficacy trials in Ethiopia, Lao PDR, and Tanzania. Furthermore, we evaluated a selection of minimal diagnostic criteria of the TPPs.
All diagnostic methods showed a clinical sensitivity of ≥90% for all STH infections of moderate-to-heavy intensities. For infections of very low intensity, only qPCR resulted in a sensitivity that was superior to a single Kato-Katz for all STHs. Compared to the reference method, both Mini-FLOTAC and FECPAKG2 resulted in significantly lower fecal egg counts for some STHs, leading to a substantial underestimation of the infection intensity. For qPCR, there was a positive significant correlation between the egg counts of a single Kato-Katz and the DNA concentration.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that the diagnostic performance of a single Kato-Katz is underestimated by the community and that diagnostic specific thresholds to classify intensity of infection are warranted for Mini-FLOTAC, FECPAKG2 and qPCR. When we strictly apply the TPPs, Kato-Katz is the only microscopy-based method that meets the minimal diagnostic criteria for application in the planning, monitoring and evaluation phase of an STH program. qPCR is the only method that could be considered in the phase that aims to seek confirmation for cessation of program.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03465488.
由于针对土壤传播性蠕虫(STHs)的驱虫计划的成功是通过定期评估流行率和感染强度来评估的,因此使用正确的诊断方法至关重要。最近,STH 社区为驱虫计划的每个阶段发布了潜在诊断方法需要满足的最低标准,即所谓的目标产品概况(TPP)。
我们比较了一种单次加藤氏(参考方法)与其他基于显微镜的方法(重复加藤氏、Mini-FLOTAC 和 FECPAKG2)和一种基于 DNA 的方法(qPCR)在埃塞俄比亚、老挝和坦桑尼亚的三项药物疗效试验中检测和定量 STH 感染的诊断性能。此外,我们评估了 TPP 的一系列最低诊断标准。
所有诊断方法对所有中重度 STH 感染的临床灵敏度均≥90%。对于非常低强度的感染,只有 qPCR 对所有 STH 的灵敏度优于单次加藤氏。与参考方法相比,Mini-FLOTAC 和 FECPAKG2 均导致某些 STH 的粪便卵计数显著降低,从而导致感染强度的严重低估。对于 qPCR,单个加藤氏的卵计数与 DNA 浓度之间存在正相关关系。
结论/意义:我们的结果表明,社区低估了单次加藤氏的诊断性能,需要为 Mini-FLOTAC、FECPAKG2 和 qPCR 制定诊断特异性阈值来分类感染强度。当我们严格应用 TPP 时,加藤氏是唯一符合 STH 计划规划、监测和评估阶段应用最低诊断标准的基于显微镜的方法。qPCR 是唯一可在旨在寻求停止计划的阶段考虑的方法。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03465488。