Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Center for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jul 2;14(7):e0008296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008296. eCollection 2020 Jul.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined moderate-to-heavy intensity (M&HI) infections with soil-transmitted helminths (Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and the two hookworms, Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus) based on specific values of eggs per gram of stool, as measured by the Kato-Katz method. There are a variety of novel microscopy and DNA-based methods but it remains unclear whether applying current WHO thresholds on to these methods allows for a reliable classification of M&HI infections. We evaluated both WHO and method-specific thresholds for classifying the M&HI infections for novel microscopic (FECPAKG2, McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC) and DNA-based (qPCR) diagnostic methods. For this, we determined method-specific thresholds that best classified M&HI infections (defined by Kato-Katz and WHO thresholds; reference method) in two multi-country drug efficacy studies. Subsequently, we verified whether applying these method-specific thresholds improved the agreement in classifying M&HI infections compared to the reference method. When we applied the WHO thresholds, the new microscopic methods mainly misclassified M&HI as low intensity, and to a lesser extent low intensity infection as M&HI. For FECPAKG2, applying the method-specific thresholds significantly improved the agreement for Ascaris (moderate → substantial), Trichuris and hookworms (fair → moderate). For Mini-FLOTAC, a significantly improved agreement was observed for hookworms only (fair → moderate). For the other STHs, the agreement was almost perfect and remained unchanged. For McMaster, the method-specific thresholds revealed a fair to a substantial agreement but did not significantly improve the agreement. For qPCR, the method-specific thresholds based on genome equivalents per ml of DNA moderately agreed with the reference method for hookworm and Trichuris infections. For Ascaris, there was a substantial agreement. We defined method-specific thresholds that improved the classification of M&HI infections. Validation studies are required before they can be recommended for general use in assessing M&HI infections in programmatic settings.
世界卫生组织(WHO)根据 Kato-Katz 法检测粪便中每克粪便的虫卵数,定义了中度至重度感染(M&HI)的土壤传播性蠕虫(蛔虫、鞭虫和两种钩虫,十二指肠钩虫和美洲钩虫)。目前有多种新型显微镜和 DNA 检测方法,但尚不清楚将当前 WHO 阈值应用于这些方法是否能可靠地分类 M&HI 感染。我们评估了 WHO 标准和基于方法的阈值,用于对新型显微镜(FECPAKG2、McMaster 和 Mini-FLOTAC)和 DNA 检测(qPCR)方法进行 M&HI 感染的分类。为此,我们在两项多国药物疗效研究中,确定了最佳分类 M&HI 感染(由 Kato-Katz 和 WHO 标准定义;参考方法)的方法特异性阈值。随后,我们验证了应用这些方法特异性阈值是否能提高分类 M&HI 感染的一致性,与参考方法相比。当我们应用 WHO 阈值时,新型显微镜方法主要将 M&HI 错误分类为低强度,在较小程度上,将低强度感染错误分类为 M&HI。对于 FECPAKG2,应用方法特异性阈值可显著提高对蛔虫(中度→显著)、鞭虫和钩虫(公平→中度)的一致性。对于 Mini-FLOTAC,仅观察到钩虫的一致性显著提高(公平→中度)。对于其他 STH,一致性几乎是完美的,且没有变化。对于 McMaster,方法特异性阈值显示出公平到显著的一致性,但没有显著提高一致性。对于 qPCR,基于 DNA 基因组当量/ml 的方法特异性阈值对钩虫和鞭虫感染的分类与参考方法中度一致。对于蛔虫,一致性显著。我们定义了可以改善 M&HI 感染分类的方法特异性阈值。在推荐其在规划环境中用于评估 M&HI 感染的一般用途之前,需要进行验证研究。