Xenotransplantation Program, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Institute of Cellular Therapeutics, Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, Allegheny Health Network, and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Int J Surg. 2019 Sep;69:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.07.032. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
It can reasonably be anticipated that, within 5-10 years, islet allotransplantation or pig islet xenotransplantation may be the preferred options for β-cell replacement therapy. The portal vein/liver is currently the preferred clinical site for free islet transplantation, constituting 90% of clinical islet transplants. Despite being the site of choice for rodent and some large animal studies, the renal subcapsular space is rarely used clinically, even though the introduction of islets intraportally is not entirely satisfactory (particularly for pig islet xenotransplantation). We questioned why this might be so. Is it perhaps based on prior clinical evidence, or from experience in nonhuman primates? When we have questioned experts in the field, no definitive answers have been forthcoming. We have therefore reviewed the relevant literature, and still cannot find a convincing reason why the renal subcapsular space has been so relatively abandoned as a site for clinical islet transplantation. Owing to its sequestered environment, subcapsular transplantation might avoid some of the remaining challenges of intraportal transplantation. This may be particularly true when using pig islets for xenotransplantation, which are exceptionally pure in comparison to human islets used in auto- or allo-transplantation. With evidence from the literature, we question the notion that the subcapsular space is inhospitable to islet transplantation and suggest that, when porcine islet transplantation is introduced, this site should perhaps be reconsidered.
可以合理地预期,在 5-10 年内,胰岛同种异体移植或猪胰岛异种移植可能成为β细胞替代治疗的首选方案。门静脉/肝脏目前是自由胰岛移植的首选临床部位,占临床胰岛移植的 90%。尽管啮齿动物和一些大型动物研究选择了该部位,但肾被膜下腔在临床上很少使用,尽管门静脉内引入胰岛并不完全令人满意(特别是对于猪胰岛异种移植)。我们想知道为什么会这样。这是基于之前的临床证据,还是来自非人类灵长类动物的经验?当我们询问该领域的专家时,并没有得到明确的答案。因此,我们回顾了相关文献,但仍然无法找到令人信服的理由来解释为什么肾被膜下腔作为临床胰岛移植的部位相对被放弃。由于其隔离的环境,被膜下移植可能会避免门静脉内移植中尚存的一些挑战。当使用猪胰岛进行异种移植时,这可能尤其如此,与用于自身或同种异体移植的人胰岛相比,猪胰岛异常纯净。根据文献中的证据,我们对被膜下腔不适合胰岛移植的观点提出质疑,并建议在引入猪胰岛移植时,应重新考虑该部位。