Perera Chanaka Aravinda, Biggers Richard Peter, Robertson Alan
Department of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
Foundation Training School, East of Scotland, Perth Royal Infirmary, Perth, UK.
BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Aug 1;12(7):e229942. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-229942.
A 73-year-old man with an 8-week history of angina underwent an exercise tolerance test at the rapid access clinic, which indicated inducible ischaemia and he was subsequently referred for angiogram. His angiogram demonstrated no coronary pathology. It was later discovered that bloods taken on the day of the procedure showed a haemoglobin of 54 g/L (130-180 g/L). His haemoglobin used to book the angiogram 3 months before was 143 g/L. Following angiogram, a mass was identified in the right iliac fossa and CT scan confirmed a caecal tumour. The patient ultimately underwent a curative right hemicolectomy as an outpatient. The case is a reminder of the importance of basic preangiogram investigations, in particularly a full blood count, to rule-out angina secondary to anaemia through a low haemoglobin. Most importantly, it also questions when the appropriate time is for these investigations to be carried out, prior to coronary angiography.
一名有8周心绞痛病史的73岁男性在快速诊疗门诊接受了运动耐量测试,结果显示有诱发性心肌缺血,随后他被转诊进行血管造影。他的血管造影显示没有冠状动脉病变。后来发现,手术当天采集的血液样本显示血红蛋白为54g/L(正常范围130 - 180g/L)。3个月前用于预约血管造影时他的血红蛋白为143g/L。血管造影后,在右髂窝发现一个肿块,CT扫描证实为盲肠肿瘤。该患者最终作为门诊病人接受了根治性右半结肠切除术。这个病例提醒我们血管造影术前基础检查的重要性,特别是全血细胞计数,以排除因血红蛋白低导致的贫血继发心绞痛。最重要的是,它还引发了对于在冠状动脉造影之前进行这些检查的合适时间的思考。