• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国医院 ICD-10-GM 编码识别急性肝损伤的有效性。

Validity of hospital ICD-10-GM codes to identify acute liver injury in Germany.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Biometry, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Institute for Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Oct;28(10):1344-1352. doi: 10.1002/pds.4855. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1002/pds.4855
PMID:31373108
Abstract

PURPOSE

Acute liver injury (ALI) is an important adverse drug reaction. We estimated the positive predictive values (PPVs) of ICD-10-GM codes of ALI used in an international postauthorisation safety study (PASS).

METHODS

Analyses used routine data (2007 to 2016, adults) from a German academic hospital in a cross-sectional design. Two algorithms from the PASS were applied to extract potential cases from the hospital information system: specific end point (A) (discharge diagnosis of liver disease-specific codes) and less specific end point (B) (discharge and outpatient-specific and nonspecific codes suggestive of liver injury). ALI cases were confirmed on the basis of plasma liver enzyme activity elevation. Secondary analysis was performed following exclusion of cases with known cancer, chronic liver, biliary and pancreatic disease, heart failure, and alcohol-related disorders, as applied in the PASS.

RESULTS

On the basis of ICD codes: outcome A, 154 cases (143 with case notes and lab data for case verification); outcome B, 485 cases (357 with case notes and lab data). ALI was confirmed in 71 outcome A cases, PPV of 49.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.2%-58.1%), and 100 outcome B cases, PPV of 28.0% (95% CI, 23.4%-33.0%). Applying exclusion criteria increased PPV (95% CI) to 62.7% (50.0%-74.2%) for outcome A and 45.7% (37.2%-54.3%) for outcome B.

CONCLUSIONS

In safety studies on hepatotoxicity based on routine data using ICD-10-GM discharge codes and when validation of potential cases is not feasible, only the more specific codes should be used to describe ALI, and competing diagnoses for liver injury should be excluded to avoid substantial misclassification.

摘要

目的

急性肝损伤(ALI)是一种重要的药物不良反应。我们评估了用于国际上市后安全性研究(PASS)的 ALI 的 ICD-10-GM 代码的阳性预测值(PPV)。

方法

分析使用了德国一家学术医院的常规数据(2007 年至 2016 年,成人),采用横断面设计。PASS 应用了两种算法从医院信息系统中提取潜在病例:特定终点(A)(肝脏疾病特定代码的出院诊断)和非特异性终点(B)(出院和门诊特定和非特异性代码提示肝损伤)。根据血浆肝酶活性升高确认 ALI 病例。次要分析是根据 PASS 中的排除标准进行的,排除了已知癌症、慢性肝病、胆道和胰腺疾病、心力衰竭和与酒精相关的疾病的病例。

结果

根据 ICD 代码:结果 A,154 例(143 例有病例记录和实验室数据进行病例验证);结果 B,485 例(357 例有病例记录和实验室数据)。在结果 A 中,154 例病例中有 71 例 ALI 得到了确认,PPV 为 49.7%(95%置信区间[CI],41.2%-58.1%),结果 B 中有 485 例病例中有 100 例 ALI 得到了确认,PPV 为 28.0%(95% CI,23.4%-33.0%)。应用排除标准后,结果 A 的 PPV(95% CI)增加至 62.7%(50.0%-74.2%),结果 B 的 PPV(95% CI)增加至 45.7%(37.2%-54.3%)。

结论

在使用 ICD-10-GM 出院代码基于常规数据的药物肝毒性安全性研究中,并且当潜在病例的验证不可行时,仅应使用更具体的代码来描述 ALI,并排除肝脏损伤的竞争诊断,以避免大量的错误分类。

相似文献

1
Validity of hospital ICD-10-GM codes to identify acute liver injury in Germany.德国医院 ICD-10-GM 编码识别急性肝损伤的有效性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Oct;28(10):1344-1352. doi: 10.1002/pds.4855. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Validity of diagnostic codes to identify cases of severe acute liver injury in the US Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database.美国食品和药物管理局 Mini-Sentinel 分布式数据库中诊断代码识别严重急性肝损伤病例的有效性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Aug;22(8):861-72. doi: 10.1002/pds.3470. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
3
Validity of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes used to identify acute liver injury: A study in three European data sources.用于识别急性肝损伤的ICD - 9和ICD - 10编码的有效性:一项基于三个欧洲数据源的研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Jul;28(7):965-975. doi: 10.1002/pds.4803. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
4
Validity of diagnostic codes and laboratory measurements to identify patients with idiopathic acute liver injury in a hospital database.利用医院数据库中的诊断编码和实验室检测结果识别特发性急性肝损伤患者的有效性
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Mar;25 Suppl 1:21-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.3824. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
5
Validity of diagnostic codes and laboratory tests of liver dysfunction to identify acute liver failure events.用于识别急性肝衰竭事件的肝功能障碍诊断编码和实验室检查的有效性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jul;24(7):676-83. doi: 10.1002/pds.3774. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
6
Validity of hospital ICD-10-GM codes to identify anaphylaxis.医院 ICD-10-GM 编码识别过敏反应的有效性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Dec;30(12):1643-1652. doi: 10.1002/pds.5348. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
7
Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes for upper gastrointestinal complications varied by position and age: a validation study in a cohort of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs users in Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy.国际疾病分类第 9 版临床修订版用于上消化道并发症的编码准确性因位置和年龄而异:意大利弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚地区非甾体抗炎药使用者队列中的验证研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):1195-204. doi: 10.1002/pds.3504. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
8
Validation of ICD-9-CM codes to identify gastrointestinal perforation events in administrative claims data among hospitalized rheumatoid arthritis patients.验证 ICD-9-CM 代码在住院类风湿关节炎患者的行政索赔数据中识别胃肠道穿孔事件的有效性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):1150-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.2215. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
9
Coding algorithms for identifying patients with cirrhosis and hepatitis B or C virus using administrative data.使用管理数据识别肝硬化和乙型或丙型肝炎病毒患者的编码算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):107-11. doi: 10.1002/pds.3721. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
10
Validation study in four health-care databases: upper gastrointestinal bleeding misclassification affects precision but not magnitude of drug-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk.在四个医疗保健数据库中的验证研究:上消化道出血的分类错误会影响药物相关上消化道出血风险的精度但不影响其幅度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;67(8):921-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.020. Epub 2014 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of diagnoses of liver disorders in users of systemic azole antifungal medication in Sweden.瑞典系统性唑类抗真菌药物使用者中肝脏疾病诊断的验证。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03110-w.
2
Oral anticoagulants and risk of acute liver injury in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a propensity-weighted nationwide cohort study.口服抗凝剂与非瓣膜性心房颤动患者急性肝损伤的风险:一项倾向评分加权的全国性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 15;10(1):11624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68304-8.
3
Hepatoprotective effects of aqueous ethanol extract against CCl-induced acute liver injury in SD rats related to Nrf2 and NF-κB signalling.
水提乙醇提取物对 CCl4 诱导的 SD 大鼠急性肝损伤的肝保护作用与 Nrf2 和 NF-κB 信号通路有关。
Pharm Biol. 2020 Dec;58(1):239-246. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2020.1739719.
4
Utility of a Computerized ICD-10 Algorithm to Identify Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Cases in the Electronic Medical Record.计算机化 ICD-10 算法在电子病历中识别特发性药物性肝损伤病例的效用。
Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;43(4):371-377. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00903-5.