Yakel John P, Meacham Kassi J, Glave A Page, Didier Jennifer J, Williams Mary L, Waters Cristina, Cole Megan, Feren Emily
Department of Kinesiology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA -
Department of Kinesiology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Aug;59(8):1281-1284. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09167-9.
The use of smartphone applications to monitor heart rate has become increasingly popular. However, there is limited research available on the validity of these applications. The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of a free heart rate monitoring application on two smartphone platforms while at rest and during moderate intensity exercise. One heart rate monitor application was chosen for two different technological platforms.
Twenty-four adults aged 18 and older (six males, 18 females) were randomly assigned a platform. Two groups were formed based on the platform being utilized. Both groups were monitored using an electrocardiograph (ECG) and the smart phone application. Heart rate for each participant was recorded while seated before exercise, and during moderate intensity exercise on an elliptical machine. Measurements were recorded in one-minute intervals.
Data was analyzed using correlations and t-tests between platforms. All data was analyzed for both resting and exercise heart rate averages. There was no significant difference in heart rate while seated, t-test (-1.33; P=0.197) nor exercise heart rate, t-test (-1.54; P=0.142) when comparing means of the two platforms to an ECG.
The applications chosen for both platforms to monitor heart rate were found to be fairly accurate, especially at rest. There are small user adaptations for monitoring heart rate, but heart rate applications provide a low-cost and efficient method for non-medical heart rate tracking. Future research should investigate the difference in accuracy for skin tone, ethnicity, race, hand size, and callosity of fingertips.
使用智能手机应用程序来监测心率已变得越来越普遍。然而,关于这些应用程序有效性的研究有限。本研究的目的是在静息状态和中等强度运动期间,检验一款免费心率监测应用程序在两个智能手机平台上的准确性。针对两个不同的技术平台选择了一款心率监测应用程序。
24名18岁及以上的成年人(6名男性,18名女性)被随机分配到一个平台。根据所使用的平台形成两组。两组均使用心电图仪(ECG)和智能手机应用程序进行监测。在运动前就座时以及在椭圆机上进行中等强度运动期间,记录每位参与者的心率。测量以一分钟的间隔进行记录。
使用平台之间的相关性和t检验对数据进行分析。对静息心率和运动心率平均值的所有数据均进行了分析。将两个平台的平均值与心电图进行比较时,就座时的心率t检验(-1.33;P = 0.197)和运动心率t检验(-1.54;P = 0.142)均无显著差异。
发现为两个平台选择的用于监测心率的应用程序相当准确,尤其是在静息状态下。在监测心率方面存在一些用户适应性问题,但心率应用程序为非医学心率跟踪提供了一种低成本且高效的方法。未来的研究应调查肤色、种族、人种、手大小和指尖胼胝体在准确性方面的差异。