Suppr超能文献

隐匿性皮肤病,普通病理学家与皮肤病理学家之间的诊断差异。

Invisible dermatosis, diagnostic discrepancy between the general pathologist and dermatopathologist.

作者信息

Alhumidi Ahmed, Alshamlan Najd, Alfaraidi Mona, Mohajer Khaled

机构信息

Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Cutan Pathol. 2019 Dec;46(12):905-912. doi: 10.1111/cup.13554. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many clinically indicated skin biopsies show minimal histological changes referred to as "invisible dermatoses." They pose a challenge to general pathologists and dermatopathologists. This study determines the discrepancy between the general pathologists' diagnosis and the dermatopathologist's diagnosis and helps define a pathway for reaching the correct diagnosis.

METHODS

In total, 81 skin cases were selected from a tertiary hospital pathology department. They were diagnosed by general pathologists as "no specific diagnosis," or "minimal pathologic changes." These cases were reviewed carefully and diagnosed by a dermatopathologist. His diagnoses were compared with the original diagnoses.

RESULTS

Out of the 81 cases, 43 cases (53%) were reported by the dermatopathologist to have a specific diagnosis while 38 cases (46.9%) remained nonspecific. Both inflammatory and neoplastic diagnoses of potential clinical significance were made in the first group of 43 cases. The remaining 38 cases with nonspecific results were due to inadequate biopsy, inactive lesions or inadequate clinical data.

CONCLUSION

"Invisible dermatoses" describes skin diseases with clinically evident but histologically hidden changes. They are difficult cases for general pathologists and dermatopathologists to diagnose. Hence, it is important to be aware that minor changes on a skin biopsy do not mean it is disease-free.

摘要

背景

许多临床指征性皮肤活检显示出微小的组织学变化,即“隐匿性皮肤病”。它们给普通病理学家和皮肤病理学家带来了挑战。本研究确定了普通病理学家诊断与皮肤病理学家诊断之间的差异,并有助于确定得出正确诊断的途径。

方法

从一家三级医院病理科总共选取81例皮肤病例。普通病理学家将其诊断为“无特异性诊断”或“微小病理变化”。对这些病例进行仔细复查,并由一名皮肤病理学家进行诊断。将他的诊断与原始诊断进行比较。

结果

在这81例病例中,皮肤病理学家报告43例(53%)有特异性诊断,而38例(46.9%)仍无特异性。在第一组43例病例中做出了具有潜在临床意义的炎症性和肿瘤性诊断。其余38例结果无特异性的病例是由于活检不充分、病变不活跃或临床资料不足。

结论

“隐匿性皮肤病”描述的是临床上有明显表现但组织学上隐匿变化的皮肤疾病。它们是普通病理学家和皮肤病理学家难以诊断的病例。因此,重要的是要意识到皮肤活检中的微小变化并不意味着没有疾病。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验