• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三份组织成员关于护理实践博士项目经验和结果的报告。

Reports of three organizations' members about doctor of nursing practice project experiences and outcomes.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville TN.

Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville TN.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2019 Nov-Dec;67(6):671-679. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2019.05.012
PMID:31375347
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Holders of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree were envisioned to improve health and health care outcomes by implementing quality improvement initiatives, applying evidence-based practice changes (EBP), and influencing policy. Little is known about the nature of the DNP project experience and its relationship with subsequent experiences of graduates. Filling these knowledge gaps is important because of the investment of time, faculty and student effort, expense, and the projects' potential long-term effects on the organizations in which they were conducted.

PURPOSE

(1) Describe the impetus for foci, outcomes and activities of DNP projects and (2) determine the extent to which project foci are a part of post-graduation experiences.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive survey design was used and a via mailed paper and online version was sent with return options to graduates of Doctor of Nursing Practice program. The sampling technique was designed to maximize the capture of DNP graduates. Three mailings were sent to 5,830 nurse members of three national organizations with memberships that included advanced practice registered nurses, nurse administrators and nurse educators. The 1,308 DNP prepared respondents were demographically and geographically representative of organizational members.

FINDINGS

Most (65.2%) reported the topic of the project was their own idea and they sought out an organization in which to conduct it. Twenty-five percent indicated not all aspects of the reorganization/initiative/policy change were completed by graduation. Five project foci emerged with the majority reporting an EBP initiative or an EBP project involving reorganization in the setting (57.7%) There was also a wide variation in the number, types and combinations of activities reported to be a part of the project. There was wide variation in the relationship of project foci and activities with reports of post-graduation experience by position title.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Findings suggest potential avenues for innovations during the DNP project experience innovations. Long term effects of projects on organizations in which they were conducted and the relationship of project activities with post-graduation roles should be considered.

摘要

背景

持有护理实践博士(DNP)学位的人被期望通过实施质量改进计划、应用循证实践变革(EBP)和影响政策来改善健康和医疗保健结果。关于 DNP 项目经验的性质及其与毕业生后续经验的关系,知之甚少。由于投入了时间、教师和学生的努力、费用,以及这些项目对其所在组织的潜在长期影响,填补这些知识空白非常重要。

目的

(1)描述 DNP 项目的焦点、结果和活动的动力,(2)确定项目焦点在多大程度上成为毕业后经验的一部分。

方法

使用横断面描述性调查设计,并通过邮寄纸质和在线版本发送给博士护理实践课程的毕业生,并提供回复选项。抽样技术旨在最大限度地捕获 DNP 毕业生。向三个国家组织的 5830 名护士成员发送了三次邮件,这些组织的成员包括高级执业注册护士、护士管理人员和护士教育工作者。1308 名接受过 DNP 培训的受访者在人口统计学和地理位置上代表了组织成员。

结果

大多数人(65.2%)报告说,项目的主题是他们自己的想法,他们寻求一个可以进行项目的组织。25%的人表示,并非所有的重组/倡议/政策变革都在毕业前完成。五个项目重点出现,大多数人报告说,在环境中有一个 EBP 倡议或一个涉及重组的 EBP 项目(57.7%)。报告的活动数量、类型和组合也有很大差异,这些活动被认为是项目的一部分。项目重点和活动与职位标题报告的毕业后经验之间的关系存在很大差异。

讨论/结论:研究结果表明,在 DNP 项目经验期间,可能存在创新的途径。应该考虑项目对其所在组织的长期影响,以及项目活动与毕业后角色的关系。

相似文献

1
Reports of three organizations' members about doctor of nursing practice project experiences and outcomes.三份组织成员关于护理实践博士项目经验和结果的报告。
Nurs Outlook. 2019 Nov-Dec;67(6):671-679. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 28.
2
The role of Doctor of Nursing Practice-prepared nurses in practice settings.护理实践博士护士在实践环境中的作用。
Nurs Outlook. 2019 Jul-Aug;67(4):354-364. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
4
Exploring the Doctor of Nursing Practice project facilitator/mentor role.探索护理实践博士项目的导师/辅导员角色。
Nurs Outlook. 2019 Jul-Aug;67(4):433-440. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
5
Impact of Practice Scholarship as Perceived by Nurses Holding a DNP Degree.持有 DNP 学位的护士对实践学术的看法所产生的影响。
J Nurs Adm. 2022 Feb 1;52(2):99-105. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001109.
6
Doctor of Nursing Practice Project Advisement: A Roadmap for Faculty and Student Success.护理实践博士项目指导:教师与学生成功之路。
J Nurs Educ. 2019 Dec 1;58(12):728-732. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20191120-09.
7
The development of practice scholarship in DNP programs: a paradigm shift.护理实践博士项目中实践学术的发展:一种范式转变。
J Prof Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;29(6):330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.08.003.
8
National evaluation of DNP students' use of the PICOT method for formulating clinical questions.对护理实践博士(DNP)学生使用PICOT方法制定临床问题的全国性评估。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Apr;21(2):216-222. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12709. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
9
Toward clarification of the doctor of nursing practice degree.关于护理实践博士学位的阐释
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2009 Oct-Dec;31(4):287-97. doi: 10.1097/TME.0b013e3181be0fd6.
10
DNP Program Faculty and Graduates' Knowledge and Use of QI and Safety Processes.DNP 项目教师和毕业生对质量改进和安全流程的知识和使用情况。
Nurse Educ. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):11-16. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000677.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and validating an intervention-specific knowledge assessment for person-centered communication in nursing home continuing education.开发并验证一种针对养老院继续教育中以患者为中心沟通的特定干预知识评估方法。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2025 Apr-Jun;46(2):295-309. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2024.2444922. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
2
A 10-year evaluation of projects in a doctor of nursing practice programme.对护理实践博士项目中的项目进行的十年评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4090-4103. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15435. Epub 2020 Aug 19.