Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, Kinmen Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, College of Health and Nursing, National Quemoy University, Taiwan.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Jan;119(1 Pt 3):524-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Emergency air medical transport (EAMT) of patients in remote areas with neurological emergencies to higher-level facilities is an integral part of the regionalized healthcare system. EAMT is safe and feasible for head injuries. Debates persist on the high cost, safety, and risk of EAMT, thereby calling for alternatives.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study by including all patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who visited the Kinmen Hospital from January 2006 to December 2016. Routine neurosurgical dispatch (RNSD) implemented since 2009, dispatches neurosurgeons to Kinmen. EAMT and 90-day mortality were assessed.
We enrolled 560 patients: 173 pre-stage and 387 post-stage. RNSD resulted in less EAMT deployment ([adjusted odds ratio AOR] = 0·23, p < 0·001) and lower 90-day mortality ([adjusted hazard ratio AHR] 0·66, p = 0·043). RNSD resulted in decreased EAMT among all subgroups, especially in age ≥81 years (AOR 0.03, p < 0.001), age 41-60 years (AOR 0.10, p < 0.001), traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (TICH) (AOR 0·11, p < 0·001), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 9-12 (AOR 0.14, p 0.001). The risk of 90-day mortality was higher in male (AHR 1.81, p = 0·006), GCS 3-8 (AHR 35.52, p < 0·001) and GCS 9-12 (AHR 7.46, p < 0·01) and lower in age 21-40 years (AHR 0.46, p = 0.034).
Incorporating RNSD with EAMT is a plausible alternative to EAMT with a significant decrease in EAMT and decreased 90-day mortality in patients with ICH compared with non-neurosurgical care with EAMT. Despite a 34% decrease in 90-day mortality after RNSD, patient characteristics such as disease severity, age, and sex still dictated patient outcomes.
背景/目的:将有神经急症的患者通过紧急空中医疗转运(EAMT)送往更高层级的医疗机构是区域化医疗体系的一个组成部分。EAMT 对于头部创伤是安全且可行的。EAMT 的高成本、安全性和风险仍存在争议,因此需要替代方案。
我们通过纳入 2006 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间在金门医院就诊的所有颅内出血(ICH)患者进行了回顾性队列研究。自 2009 年起实施常规神经外科派遣(RNSD),派遣神经外科医生前往金门。评估 EAMT 和 90 天死亡率。
我们共纳入了 560 名患者:173 名前期和 387 名后期。RNSD 减少了 EAMT 的使用(调整后的优势比 AOR=0.23,p<0.001),降低了 90 天死亡率(调整后的风险比 AHR=0.66,p=0.043)。RNSD 减少了所有亚组中的 EAMT,尤其是 81 岁以上(AOR=0.03,p<0.001)、41-60 岁(AOR=0.10,p<0.001)、创伤性颅内出血(TICH)(AOR=0.11,p<0.001)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)9-12 分(AOR=0.14,p<0.001)。男性(AHR=1.81,p=0.006)、GCS 3-8 分(AHR=35.52,p<0.001)和 GCS 9-12 分(AHR=7.46,p<0.01)的 90 天死亡率较高,21-40 岁的患者(AHR=0.46,p=0.034)的 90 天死亡率较低。
将 RNSD 与 EAMT 结合起来,与 EAMT 相比,可显著减少 EAMT,并降低 EAMT 治疗颅内出血患者的 90 天死亡率,是一种可行的替代方案。尽管 RNSD 后 90 天死亡率降低了 34%,但患者的疾病严重程度、年龄和性别等特征仍决定了患者的结局。